NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 275 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jang, Yoona; Hong, Sehee – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2023
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of classification quality in the basic latent class model when covariates are either included or are not included in the model. To accomplish this task, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted in which the results of models with and without a covariate were compared. Based on these simulations,…
Descriptors: Classification, Models, Prediction, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sosa, Ricardo; van Dijck, Max – Creativity Research Journal, 2022
The distinction between "Big-C" and "little-c" creativity implies that the generative process of celebrated creators is of a special type or degree. Arguments for and against such a hierarchy of creativity are found in the literature, primarily built on rhetorical argumentation. The aim of this work is to examine the rationale…
Descriptors: Creativity, Computer Simulation, Models, Social Systems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seda Abacioglu; Büsra Ayan; Dragan Pamucar – Innovative Higher Education, 2025
This study investigates the evolving landscape of green universities by analyzing and comparing rankings from 2018 to 2022. It expands beyond the single score offered by the UI GreenMetric, employing Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques to evaluate universities from diverse perspectives. Focusing on the top 50 universities from 2022,…
Descriptors: Universities, Comparative Education, Comparative Analysis, Reputation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pollard, Alison; Forss, Kim – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
Quality Assessment Frameworks (QAFs) are standardized templates that include pre-defined criteria, open questions, or a combination to assess the quality of evaluations. They support organizations to limit risks associated with poor-quality evaluation. Qualitative research focused on four QAFs shows that five dimensions of quality are assessed…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Guidelines, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zheng, Hong; Thomas, Sally – Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2022
This paper presents new evidence that explores the strengths, weaknesses and overall quality of school inspection practice in China. In one city region of Shandong Province, the research examines stakeholder perceptions of inspection purposes, processes and outcomes, as well as the potential to improve inspection practice and compulsory education…
Descriptors: Inspection, Accountability, Institutional Evaluation, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf; Tan, Christine Nya-Ling; Daud, Mahyuddin; Awalludin, Muhammad Mukhtar Noor – Issues in Educational Research, 2020
University rankings have gradually become an issue for concern in the academic community worldwide. Several mechanisms with different methodologies have been developed to rank the universities appropriately. However, some ranking tools have notable issues, especially with the indicators adopted. Some are based merely on research performance,…
Descriptors: Universities, Institutional Evaluation, Reputation, Comparative Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Miller, Serena – Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 2022
The tenure and promotion system influences whether, how, and the extent faculty members produce creative scholarship. A thematic analysis of 69 media and communication departments' documents was carried out to systematically assess creative scholarship standards. The results showed most documents formally recognized creative scholarship and…
Descriptors: Tenure, Faculty Promotion, Evaluation Criteria, Standards
Joe Olsen – ProQuest LLC, 2023
Instructional explanations are an ubiquitous component of classroom instruction, but are relatively neglected in science education when compared to other facets of teaching and learning. The ubiquity of instructional explanations and their potential to stimulate learning in students suggests that they should garner more attention from science…
Descriptors: Physics, Comparative Analysis, Student Attitudes, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marshall, Neil; Shaw, Kirsten; Hunter, Jodie; Jones, Ian – New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 2020
There is growing interest in using comparative judgement to assess student work as an alternative to traditional marking. Comparative judgement requires no rubrics and is instead grounded in experts making pairwise judgements about the relative 'quality' of students' work according to a high level criterion. The resulting decision data are fitted…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Romeo, Marina; Yepes-Baldó, Montserrat; González, Vicenta; Burset, Silvia; Martín, Carolina; Bosch, Emma – International Journal of Instruction, 2022
The assessment process in higher education considers four aspects: assessment agents, procedure, content, and scoring. In this study, we delve into the who. We analyze the role of transversal competence assessment agents in the framework of professional internships in university master's degree programs, comparing the suitability of their…
Descriptors: Internship Programs, Higher Education, Evaluators, Masters Programs
Siebrase, Benjamin – ProQuest LLC, 2018
Multilayer perceptron neural networks, Gaussian naive Bayes, and logistic regression classifiers were compared when used to make early predictions regarding one-year college student persistence. Two iterations of each model were built, utilizing a grid search process within 10-fold cross-validation in order to tune model parameters for optimal…
Descriptors: Classification, College Students, Academic Persistence, Bayesian Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lioutas, Evagelos D.; Charatsari, Chrysanthi; Cernic Istenic, Majda; La Rocca, Giuseppe; De Rosa, Marcello – Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2019
Purpose: Considering current debates on ecosystem services' effectiveness and the AIS/AKIS functioning, in this study we suggest a new, systemic way to evaluate extension systems (ESs). Using this model, we compared the effectiveness of ESs in three countries with essential differences but also characteristic similarities in their agricultural…
Descriptors: Cross Cultural Studies, Rural Extension, Foreign Countries, Agricultural Occupations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Malec, Wojciech; Krzeminska-Adamek, Malgorzata – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2020
The main objective of the article is to compare several methods of evaluating multiple-choice options through classical item analysis. The methods subjected to examination include the tabulation of choice distribution, the interpretation of trace lines, the point-biserial correlation, the categorical analysis of trace lines, and the investigation…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Multiple Choice Tests, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Ming; Harring, Jeffrey R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
Researchers continue to be interested in efficient, accurate methods of estimating coefficients of covariates in mixture modeling. Including covariates related to the latent class analysis not only may improve the ability of the mixture model to clearly differentiate between subjects but also makes interpretation of latent group membership more…
Descriptors: Simulation, Comparative Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Chase, Manisha Kaur – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2020
Traditional classroom assessment practice often leaves students out of the conversation, exacerbating the unequal power distribution in the classroom. Viewing classrooms as autonomy-inhibiting is known to influence students' psychosocial wellbeing as well as their academic achievement. This is especially relevant in STEM fields where marginalized…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Pilot Projects, Intervention, Pretests Posttests
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  19