Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 3 |
| Test Selection | 3 |
| Action Research | 1 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Educational Trends | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ankenman, Robert D. | 1 |
| Chen, Shu-Ying | 1 |
| Morris, Allison | 1 |
| Singh, Upasana Gitanjali | 1 |
| de Villiers, Mary Ruth | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textSingh, Upasana Gitanjali; de Villiers, Mary Ruth – International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2017
e-Assessment, in the form of tools and systems that deliver and administer multiple choice questions (MCQs), is used increasingly, raising the need for evaluation and validation of such systems. This research uses literature and a series of six empirical action research studies to develop an evaluation framework of categories and criteria called…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Selection, Action Research
Direct linkMorris, Allison – OECD Publishing (NJ1), 2011
This report discusses the most relevant issues concerning student standardised testing in which there are no-stakes for students ("standardised testing") through a literature review and a review of the trends in standardised testing in OECD countries. Unlike standardised tests in which there are high-stakes for students, no-stakes implies that…
Descriptors: Standardized Tests, Testing, Educational Trends, Educational Research
Chen, Shu-Ying; Ankenman, Robert D. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of four item selection rules--(1) Fisher information (F), (2) Fisher information with a posterior distribution (FP), (3) Kullback-Leibler information with a posterior distribution (KP), and (4) completely randomized item selection (RN)--with respect to the precision of trait estimation and the…
Descriptors: Test Length, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Selection
