Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Databases | 6 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 6 |
| Quality Control | 6 |
| Documentation | 2 |
| Library Material Selection | 2 |
| Publications | 2 |
| Reprography | 2 |
| Surveys | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Audits (Verification) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkOECD Publishing (NJ1), 2012
The "PISA 2009 Technical Report" describes the methodology underlying the PISA 2009 survey. It examines additional features related to the implementation of the project at a level of detail that allows researchers to understand and replicate its analyses. The reader will find a wealth of information on the test and sample design,…
Descriptors: Quality Control, Research Reports, Research Methodology, Evaluation Criteria
Download full textBrandhorst, Ted, Ed. – 1992
Rules and guidelines are provided governing the selection of documents and journal articles to be included in the ERIC database. Selection criteria are described under the five headings: (1) Appropriateness of content/subject matter; (2) Suitability of format, medium, document type; (3) Quality of content; (4) Legibility and reproducibility; (5)…
Descriptors: Databases, Documentation, Evaluation Criteria, Library Material Selection
Sundstrom, Grace, Ed. – 1980
Rules and guidelines are provided governing the selection of documents and journal articles to be included in the ERIC database. Selection criteria are described under the five headings: (1) Appropriateness of content/subject matter; (2) Suitability of format, medium, document type; (3) Quality of content; (4) Legibility and reproducibility; (5)…
Descriptors: Databases, Documentation, Evaluation Criteria, Library Material Selection
Peer reviewedGranick, Lois – Information Services and Use, 1991
Discussion of the quality of databases and database producers' responsibilities highlights a survey on current practices related to quality assurance that was completed by National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services (NFAIS) members. A checklist developed by the Southern California Online Users' Group (SCOUG) to help evaluate…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Database Producers, Databases, Evaluation Criteria
Tauber, Robert T. – Research Intelligence, 1985
Reports responses of 15 ERIC Clearinghouses to three questions concerning the internal mechanics of evaluating unsolicited manuscripts for "Resources in Education": acceptance rate (average rate was cited as 50%); academic credentials of those who make final evaluation; and selection criteria. Eight sources are given. (EJS)
Descriptors: Clearinghouses, Credibility, Databases, Evaluation Criteria
Basch, Reva, Ed. – 1995
How do you judge the accuracy, reliability, and completeness of an electronic or online database? What measures do publishers and distributors employ to ensure that quality standards are met? Who is responsible for what part of the process? Eighteen contributors address these questions and more in their discussion of an important issue in today's…
Descriptors: Databases, Electronic Publishing, Evaluation Criteria, Information Dissemination
