NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Every Student Succeeds Act…1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 30 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lise Vikan Sandvik; Kari Smith; Alex Strømme; Bodil Svendsen; Oda Aasmundstad Sommervold; Stine Aarønes Angvik – Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2024
During COVID-19, distance learning has given students around the world unforeseen challenges, including the way their learning is being assessed. Assessment for learning (AfL) can contribute to the development of students' strategies to meet unknown challenges as lifelong learners. The purpose of AfL is to inform learning, and it can play a…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Secondary School Students, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Amirhossein Rasooli; Jim Turner; Tünde Varga-Atkins; Edd Pitt; Shaghayegh Asgari; Will Moindrot – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2025
Groupwork is a crucial aspect of work contexts and a key twenty first century skill. Assessment of groupwork provides a persistent challenge for educators in university contexts with students reporting experiences of unfairness from their peers during groupwork. This study developed a novel Peer Assessment Fairness Instrument to explore factors…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, College Faculty
Mari Quanbeck; Sheryl S. Lazarus; Martha L. Thurlow – National Center on Educational Outcomes, 2023
In the years since the 2015 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) placed a 1.0% cap for states on participation in the alternate assessment based on alternate academic achievement standards (AA-AAAS), states have worked hard to navigate the new restrictions on participation in…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Alternative Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gielen, Sarah; Dochy, Filip; Onghena, Patrick; Struyven, Katrien; Smeets, Stijn – Studies in Higher Education, 2011
The output of peer assessment in higher education has been investigated increasingly in recent decades. However, this output is evaluated against a variety of quality criteria, resulting in a cluttered picture. This article analyses the different conceptualisations of quality that appear in the literature. Discussions about the most appropriate…
Descriptors: Social Control, Evaluation Criteria, Lifelong Learning, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wee, Mee-Chin; Abrizah, A.; Por, Lip Yee – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2012
A CMI-based online forum is designed to address the need for a system to manage students' online participation. The proposed system may reduce the time required to manage online participation. The system was evaluated by a total of 64 students enrolled in an academic semester. The evaluation has two objectives. The first was to determine the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Discussion, Computer Software Evaluation, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nandi, Dip; Hamilton, Margaret; Harland, James – Distance Education, 2012
Fully online courses are becoming progressively more popular because of their "anytime anywhere" learning flexibility. One of the ways students interact with each other and with the instructors within fully online learning environments is via asynchronous discussion forums. However, student engagement in online discussion forums does not…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Learner Engagement, Electronic Learning, Online Courses
Bennett, Paul; Bergan, Sjur; Cassar, Daniela; Hamilton, Marlene; Soinila, Michele; Sursock, Andree; Uvalic-Trumbic, Stamenka; Williams, Peter – ENQA (European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education), 2010
The present report is the product of an ENQA (European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education) Bologna Seminar "Quality Assurance in Transnational Education: from words to action" hosted by the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA, UK) in London in December, 2008. The seminar discussed the current trends in Transnational…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Seminars, Quality Control
Bloom, Thomas K. – Man/Society/Technology, 1974
Peer input in the evaluation process should be viewed as an additional source of data for the instructor to use to the best advantage in terms of his course objectives, the nature of the students he is working with, and to induce further student participation in the learning process. (Author/DS)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Peer Evaluation, Peer Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van Hattum-Janssen, Natascha; Lourenco, Julia Maria – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2006
This article will outline the motives for the implementation of peer assessment as put into action at the first year of the Civil Engineering course of the University of Minho. The implementation of new assessment methods was a consequence of the successful implementation of peer assessment at other engineering courses. During the semester, three…
Descriptors: Civil Engineering, Teaching Methods, Evaluation Methods, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haag, Russ; And Others – Music Educators Journal, 1988
Presents several strategies for evaluating elementary and secondary music students. Includes an objective-based system in which students earn points for attendance, participation, and performance. Examines written evaluations, and points for progress, discussing evaluation as a teaching aid. Describes a "fair grading system" which evaluates effort…
Descriptors: Attendance, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Armstrong, Merilyn; Boud, David – Studies in Higher Education, 1983
Assessment of class participation can be used effectively in student evaluation, but it should not become subjective, impressionistic, and unreliable. It provides an opportunity for peer and self-evaluation, but refinements in techniques and criteria are needed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Siegel, Gerald – Exercise Exchange, 1977
Provides an evaluation form to give some objectivity to grading class discussion. Suggests that students be allowed to respond to the evaluations before a final grade is given. (TJ)
Descriptors: Class Activities, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lyons, Paul R. – College Teaching, 1989
Behaviorally anchored rating scales, designed as a performance assessment tool, are applied to the assessment of student participation in classroom discussion for grading purposes. Specific instructions are given for introducing the scales in class and involving students in their use. (MSE)
Descriptors: Classroom Communication, College Instruction, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Evaluation Criteria
Karr, Jo Ann – 1994
This paper discusses the development of collaborative assessment models, using a laboratory study of rocks by middle school students as an example. It focuses on the use of collaborative assessment as part of an ongoing classroom process that involves the teacher, student, peers, and a family member. A schedule of checkpoints can be developed for…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Educational Attitudes, Elementary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kiernan, Irene R. – Community and Junior College Journal, 1975
This paper presents eleven questions which must be raised concerning the use of student evaluations of community college teachers. Ten questions deal with the political, sociological, and psychological implications of the student evaluations currently in use. The last question concerns a legal matter--the use of unvalidated tests. (Author/DC)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2