Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
Intelligence Tests | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Alternative Assessment | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Demography | 1 |
Disabilities | 1 |
Doctoral Degrees | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Arizona | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
South Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 3 |
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
Peabody Individual… | 1 |
Social Skills Rating System | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peguero, Wendy – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Administration and scoring of cognitive assessments have evolved from a paper-based platform to a digital format. Since this advancement, Pearson has created a system (Q-interactive) that allows examiners to administer the WISC-V via two iPads. However, limited research exists exploring the effects of this new method of administration when…
Descriptors: Children, Intelligence Tests, Examiners, Computer Assisted Testing
Kettler, Ryan J.; Elliott, Stephen N.; Kurz, Alexander; Zigmond, Naomi; Lemons, Christopher J.; Kloo, Amanda; Shrago, Jacqueline; Beddow, Peter A.; Williams, Leila; Bruen, Charles; Lupp, Lynda; Farmer, Jeanie; Mosiman, Melanie – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2014
Motivated by the multiple-measures clause of recent federal policy regarding student eligibility for alternate assessments based on modified academic achievement standards (AA-MASs), this study examined how scores or combinations of scores from a diverse set of assessments predicted students' end-of-year proficiency status on statewide achievement…
Descriptors: Eligibility, Alternative Assessment, Academic Achievement, Predictive Validity
Kuentzel, Jeffrey G.; Hetterscheidt, Lesley A.; Barnett, Douglas – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2011
The rigors of standardized testing make for numerous opportunities for examiner error, including simple computational mistakes in scoring. Although experts recommend that test scoring be double-checked, the extent to which independent double-checking would reduce scoring errors is not known. A double-checking procedure was established at a…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Intelligence, Testing, Standardized Tests