Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Coen, Thomas | 1 |
Gill, Brian | 1 |
Holland, Paul | 1 |
Lu, Ying | 1 |
Pitoniak, Mary | 1 |
Place, Kate | 1 |
Rizavi, Saba | 1 |
Shoji, Megan | 1 |
Sinharay, Sandip | 1 |
Steffen, Manfred | 1 |
Way, Walter D. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Colorado (Denver) | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
New York (New York) | 1 |
North Carolina (Charlotte) | 1 |
Tennessee (Memphis) | 1 |
Texas (Dallas) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
California Achievement Tests | 1 |
Medical College Admission Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gill, Brian; Shoji, Megan; Coen, Thomas; Place, Kate – Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic, 2016
School districts and states across the Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic Region and the country as a whole have been modifying their teacher evaluation systems to identify more effective and less effective teachers and provide better feedback to improve instructional practice. The new systems typically include components related to…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Test Bias, Test Content, School Districts
Sinharay, Sandip; Holland, Paul – ETS Research Report Series, 2006
It is a widely held belief that anchor tests should be miniature versions (i.e., minitests), with respect to content and statistical characteristics of the tests being equated. This paper examines the foundations for this belief. It examines the requirement of statistical representativeness of anchor tests that are content representative. The…
Descriptors: Test Items, Equated Scores, Evaluation Methods, Difficulty Level
Rizavi, Saba; Way, Walter D.; Lu, Ying; Pitoniak, Mary; Steffen, Manfred – Online Submission, 2004
The purpose of this study was to use realistically simulated data to evaluate various CAT designs for use with the verbal reasoning measure of the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT). Factors such as item pool depth, content constraints, and item formats often cause repeated adaptive administrations of an item at ability levels that are not…
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Bias, Item Banks, College Admission