Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Q Methodology | 3 |
| Design | 2 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Humanism | 1 |
| Individual Psychology | 1 |
| Learning | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkRieber, Lloyd P. – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020
An important element of good design, instructional or otherwise, is awareness of and being empathetic to the needs, wants, interests, values, and opinions of the intended audience. Typical approaches to learning about the subjective viewpoints of a particular audience have included survey instruments based on Likert-type items and open-ended…
Descriptors: Q Methodology, Design, Profiles, Evaluation Methods
Smith, Donald E.; And Others – Texas Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1979
This paper reviews the theoretical and research foundations for the Q sort procedure. Steps in the development of Q sort instruments are described and a model for the practical use of Q sort results in counseling is developed. The Q sort is the client's own description of himself. (Author)
Descriptors: Counselors, Evaluation Methods, Individual Psychology, Personality Assessment
Repicky, Paul A. – 1974
This paper focuses on the necessity for a holistic, responsive evaluation of the educational process due to education's complex, dynamic, and humanistic nature. Holistic evaluation involves the assessment of all intended goals, interactions, and program results, as opposed to selective evaluation of only a few key variables. Responsive evaluation…
Descriptors: Design, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
