NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 25 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baron, Patricia; Sireci, Stephen G.; Slater, Sharon C. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2021
Since the No Child Left Behind Act (No Child Left Behind [NCLB], 2001) was enacted, the Bookmark method has been used in many state standard setting studies (Karantonis and Sireci; Zieky, Perie, and Livingston). The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the criticism that when panelists are presented with data during the Bookmark standard…
Descriptors: State Standards, Standard Setting, Evaluators, Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reese Butterfuss; Harold Doran – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2025
Large language models are increasingly used in educational and psychological measurement activities. Their rapidly evolving sophistication and ability to detect language semantics make them viable tools to supplement subject matter experts and their reviews of large amounts of text statements, such as educational content standards. This paper…
Descriptors: Alignment (Education), Academic Standards, Content Analysis, Concept Mapping
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peabody, Michael R.; Muckle, Timothy J.; Meng, Yu – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2023
The subjective aspect of standard-setting is often criticized, yet data-driven standard-setting methods are rarely applied. Therefore, we applied a mixture Rasch model approach to setting performance standards across several testing programs of various sizes and compared the results to existing passing standards derived from traditional…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Standard Setting, Testing, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lewis, Jennifer; Lim, Hwanggyu; Padellaro, Frank; Sireci, Stephen G.; Zenisky, April L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022
Setting cut scores on (MSTs) is difficult, particularly when the test spans several grade levels, and the selection of items from MST panels must reflect the operational test specifications. In this study, we describe, illustrate, and evaluate three methods for mapping panelists' Angoff ratings into cut scores on the scale underlying an MST. The…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baldwin, Peter – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2021
In the Bookmark standard-setting procedure, panelists are instructed to consider what examinees know rather than what they might attain by guessing; however, because examinees sometimes do guess, the procedure includes a correction for guessing. Like other corrections for guessing, the Bookmark's correction assumes that examinees either know the…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baldwin, Peter; Margolis, Melissa J.; Clauser, Brian E.; Mee, Janet; Winward, Marcia – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
Evidence of the internal consistency of standard-setting judgments is a critical part of the validity argument for tests used to make classification decisions. The bookmark standard-setting procedure is a popular approach to establishing performance standards, but there is relatively little research that reflects on the internal consistency of the…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Probability, Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
One commonly used compromise standard-setting method is the Beuk (1984) method. A key assumption of the Beuk method is that the emphasis given to the pass rate and the percent correct ratings should be proportional to the extent that the panelists agree on their ratings. However, whether the slope of Beuk line reflects the emphasis that panelists…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Weighted Scores, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E.; Babcock, Ben – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
A common belief is that the Bookmark method is a cognitively simpler standard-setting method than the modified Angoff method. However, a limited amount of research has investigated panelist's ability to perform well the Bookmark method, and whether some of the challenges panelists face with the Angoff method may also be present in the Bookmark…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Evaluation Methods, Testing Problems, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sinharay, Sandip – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2019
Test score users often demand the reporting of subscores due to their potential diagnostic, remedial, and instructional benefits. Therefore, there is substantial pressure on testing programs to report subscores. However, professional standards require that subscores have to satisfy minimum quality standards before they can be reported. In this…
Descriptors: Testing, Scores, Item Response Theory, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lewis, Daniel; Cook, Robert – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
In this paper we assert that the practice of principled assessment design renders traditional standard-setting methodology redundant at best and contradictory at worst. We describe the rationale for, and methodological details of, Embedded Standard Setting (ESS; previously, Engineered Cut Scores. Lewis, 2016), an approach to establish performance…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Evaluation, Cutting Scores, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stephen G. Sireci; Javier Suárez-Álvarez; April L. Zenisky; Maria Elena Oliveri – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2024
The goal in personalized assessment is to best fit the needs of each individual test taker, given the assessment purposes. Design-in-Real-Time (DIRTy) assessment reflects the progressive evolution in testing from a single test, to an adaptive test, to an adaptive assessment "system." In this article, we lay the foundation for DIRTy…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Student Needs, Test Format, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harris, Christopher J.; Krajcik, Joseph S.; Pellegrino, James W.; DeBarger, Angela Haydel – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2019
Contemporary views on learning highlight that deep learning occurs not simply by accumulating knowledge, but by using and applying knowledge as one engages in disciplinary activity. Increasingly, those concerned with education policy and practice are shifting priorities toward supporting deeper learning by emphasizing the importance of students'…
Descriptors: Measurement, Learning Processes, Standards, Science Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E.; Babcock, Ben – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2017
This article provides an overview of the Hofstee standard-setting method and illustrates several situations where the Hofstee method will produce undefined cut scores. The situations where the cut scores will be undefined involve cases where the line segment derived from the Hofstee ratings does not intersect the score distribution curve based on…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evans, Carla M.; Lyons, Susan – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2017
The purpose of this study was to test methods that strengthen the comparability claims about annual determinations of student proficiency in English language arts, math, and science (Grades 3-12) in the New Hampshire Performance Assessment of Competency Education (NH PACE) pilot project. First, we examined the literature in order to define…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Language Arts, Mathematics Achievement, Science Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Flowers, Claudia; Wakeman, Shawnee; Browder, Diane M.; Karvonen, Meagan – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2009
This article describes an alignment procedure, called Links for Academic Learning (LAL), for examining the degree of alignment of alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) to grade-level content standards and instruction. Although some of the alignment criteria are similar to those used in general education…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Criteria, Alignment (Education), Alternative Assessment
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2