Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 4 |
Models | 4 |
Training | 2 |
Classification | 1 |
Community Surveys | 1 |
Delphi Technique | 1 |
Evaluation Research | 1 |
Factor Analysis | 1 |
Group Activities | 1 |
Human Capital | 1 |
Human Resources | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Human Resource Development… | 4 |
Author
Chermack, Thomas J. | 1 |
Clarke, Nicholas | 1 |
Holton, Elwood F., III | 1 |
Kaufman, Roger | 1 |
Keller, John M. | 1 |
Kirkpatrick, Donald L. | 1 |
Zula, Kenneth J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Clarke, Nicholas – Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2012
The changing context of work and organizations is making new demands of leadership. Differing expectations on the goals of leadership training, and development are also emerging. To date, few comprehensive models to guide evaluation research and practice in the field of leadership training and development have appeared in the literature. This…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Leadership, Leadership Training, Evaluation Research
Zula, Kenneth J.; Chermack, Thomas J. – Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2008
This article reports on development and validation of an instrument for use in human capital approaches for organizational planning. The article describes use of a team of subject matter experts in developing a measure of human capital planning, and use of exploratory factor analysis techniques to validate the resulting instrument. These data were…
Descriptors: Human Capital, Factor Analysis, Human Resources, Validity

Kaufman, Roger; Keller, John M. – Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1994
Expands Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model (reaction, learning, behavior, results) to five levels: enabling/reaction, acquisition, application, organizational outputs, and societal outcomes. The expanded model enables consideration of the value and worth of training resources as well as the broader social consequences. (SK)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Institutional Characteristics, Models, Social Environment

Holton, Elwood F., III; Kirkpatrick, Donald L. – Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1996
Holton critiques Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model and presents a new model that accounts for primary intervening variables. Kirkpatrick argues that the criticism fails to account for his model's practical utility. Holton elaborates on the distinction between a model and a taxonomy. (SK)
Descriptors: Classification, Evaluation Methods, Job Performance, Models