Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 8 |
| Models | 8 |
| Program Evaluation | 5 |
| Career Education | 4 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 3 |
| Guidelines | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Demonstration Programs | 2 |
| Measurement Techniques | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Research and… | 8 |
Author
| Baker, Octave V. | 1 |
| Brown, Edward K. | 1 |
| Kresh, Esther | 1 |
| Owens, Thomas R. | 1 |
| Peterson, Ken | 1 |
| Post, John O., Jr. | 1 |
| Ryan, Charles W. | 1 |
| Stufflebeam, Daniel L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Massachusetts | 1 |
| Oregon | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKresh, Esther – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1970
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedBrown, Edward K. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1970
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Models
Peer reviewedStufflebeam, Daniel L. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1971
Analysis supports the theory that the CIPP Evaluation Model provides both proactive support for decision making and retroactive support for accountability. (Author)
Descriptors: Accountability, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedPeterson, Ken – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1984
Current interest in the topic of teacher evaluation indicates a need for better evaluation techniques. The methodological problems in teacher evaluation are explored through a discussion of audiences, models, sources for data, and modes of reporting. Directions for development by researchers and practitioners are presented. (DF)
Descriptors: Audiences, Evaluation Methods, Information Dissemination, Information Sources
Peer reviewedPost, John O., Jr. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1979
The problem dealt with here is that of developing evaluation procedures that will determine, through objective evidence, the merit of a demonstration project that uses an infusion approach to career education in an ongoing school system. The design of this process has emerged from the Occupational Competence Access Project. (Author)
Descriptors: Career Education, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedBaker, Octave V. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1979
This article presents the criteria developed by the American Institutes for Research to select evaluated exemplary career education projects across the nation for submission to the Joint Dissemination and Review Panel (JDRP) of the Office of Education (USOE) and the National Institute of Education (NIE). (Author)
Descriptors: Career Education, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedRyan, Charles W.; And Others – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1979
This paper reports several of the major findings of the 1976-77 University Based Career Education Project that have implications for college and university staff development planners and presents the major elements and techniques of the evaluation model used in 1977-78. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Career Education, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Guidelines
Peer reviewedOwens, Thomas R.; And Others – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1979
After briefly describing the Community Experiences for Career Education project, this paper discusses 11 evaluation strategies used with the project, assesses the strengths and limitations of each, shows some relationships among them, discusses ways of communicating evaluation findings, and suggests selection criteria to others planning multiple…
Descriptors: Career Education, Comparative Analysis, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Criteria


