NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lambie, Glenn W.; Mullen, Patrick R.; Swank, Jacqueline M.; Blount, Ashley – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2018
Supervisors evaluated counselors-in-training at multiple points during their practicum experience using the Counseling Competencies Scale (CCS; N = 1,070). The CCS evaluations were randomly split to conduct exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, resulting in a 2-factor model (61.5% of the variance explained).
Descriptors: Counselor Training, Counseling, Measures (Individuals), Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wise, Edward A.; Streiner, David L.; Walfish, Steven – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2010
This article provides a review of the literature to determine the most frequently used personality tests. Based on this review, internal consistency and test-retest reliability coefficients from the test manuals for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2), Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III), and Personality…
Descriptors: Guides, Personality Assessment, Test Reliability, Personality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barry, Carol L.; Finney, Sara J. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2009
Two studies were conducted to examine validity evidence for the College Self-Efficacy Inventory, by investigating dimensionality and theoretically based relationships with external criteria. Modifications to the scale yielded an adequately fitting three-factor model, and most hypothesized relationships were empirically supported. However,…
Descriptors: Self Efficacy, Disproportionate Representation, Construct Validity, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feldt, Leonard S.; Charter, Richard A. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2003
Evaluating a test's reliability often requires dividing it into 3 or more unequal parts, which causes violation of the tau equivalence assumption of Cronbach's alpha. This article presents a criterion for abandoning alpha and an approach for computing a more appropriate estimate of reliability, the Gilmer-Feldt coefficient. (Author)
Descriptors: Counseling, Evaluation Methods, Psychometrics, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Piedmont, Ralph L.; Sherman, Martin F.; Sherman, Nancy C.; Williams, Joseph E. G. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2003
This study examined the psychometrics of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders Personality Questionnaire (SCID-IIP) self-report personality questionnaire. The responses to the instrument were found reliable and evidenced good self-other convergence. Correlations with external criteria showed the SCID-IIP to contain…
Descriptors: Correlation, Evaluation Methods, Personality Measures, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Roberts, J. Kyle; Daniel, Larry G. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2005
In this article, the authors (a) illustrate how displaying disattenuated correlation coefficients alongside their unadjusted counterparts will allow researchers to assess the impact of unreliability on bivariate relationships and (b) demonstrate how a proposed new "what if reliability" analysis can complement null hypothesis significance…
Descriptors: Correlation, Statistical Significance, Reliability, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cohen, Paul J.; Glaser, Brian A.; Calhoun, Georgia B.; Bradshaw, Catherine P.; Petrocelli, John V. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2005
The authors describe use and development of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (E. I. McConnaughy, J. O. Prochaska, & W. F. Velicer, 1983) and examine the psychometric properties of scores from incarcerated male adolescents. Cluster analysis revealed 3 unique profiles (Precontemplators, Participators, and Undifferentiated).…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Adolescents, Behavior Problems, Males
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trevisan, Michael S. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1996
The Draw a Person: Screening Procedures for Emotional Disturbance (DAP:SPED) is a projective technique used in the initial assessment of children suffering from emotional problems, and unlike most projective techniques, features sound psychometric development. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Diagnostic Tests, Emotional Disturbances, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shoffner, Marie F.; Vacc, Nicholas A. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1999
Provides psychometric data on the Inviting School Safety Survey (ISSS) while examining the instrument's factor structure and internal consistency. Results indicate that the ISSS can provide a potential framework for measuring the influence of interventions on students' feelings of safety and freedom from delinquent and violent acts in the school…
Descriptors: Educational Environment, Evaluation Methods, High School Students, High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Merenda, Peter F. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1996
The Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC), which was designed to assess both children's and adolescents' emotional disorders, personality constructs, and behavior problems, is discussed. Discusses the BASC technical manual, and psychometric properties such as norms, reliability, and validity. Offers favorable commentary for the BASC. (KW)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Behavior Problems, Children, Emotional Disturbances
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Young, Ellie L.; Sudweeks, Richard R. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2005
Differential item functioning (DIF) in the Multidimensional Self Concept Scale (B. A. Bracken, 1992) was evaluated using 2 different methods to identify and describe DIF. Of 149 items from the Multidimensional Self Concept Scale, 42% exhibited gender DIF. Nonuniform, crossover DIF was evident in items throughout the instrument.
Descriptors: Early Adolescents, Measures (Individuals), Self Concept, Test Items