NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Robert C. Lorenz; Mirjam Jenny; Anja Jacobs; Katja Matthias – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Conducting high-quality overviews of reviews (OoR) is time-consuming. Because the quality of systematic reviews (SRs) varies, it is necessary to critically appraise SRs when conducting an OoR. A well-established appraisal tool is A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2, which takes about 15-32 min per application. To save time,…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Time Management, Evaluation Methods, Quality Assurance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boon, Michele Hilton; Thomson, Hilary – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
Effect direction (evidence to indicate improvement, deterioration, or no change in an outcome) can be used as a standardized metric which enables the synthesis of diverse effect measures in systematic reviews. The effect direction (ED) plot was developed to support the synthesis and visualization of effect direction data. Methods for the ED plot…
Descriptors: Visualization, Data Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Guidance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Proctor, Tanja; Zimmermann, Samuel; Seide, Svenja; Kieser, Meinhard – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
During drug development, a biomarker is sometimes identified as separating a patient population into those with more and those with less benefit from evaluated treatments. Consequently, later studies might be targeted, while earlier ones are performed in mixed patient populations. This poses a challenge in evidence synthesis, especially if only…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Meta Analysis, Patients, Medical Research