Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 4 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 4 |
| Evaluation Methods | 4 |
| Accuracy | 2 |
| Error of Measurement | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Hierarchical Linear Modeling | 2 |
| Simulation | 2 |
| Structural Equation Models | 2 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Structural Equation Modeling:… | 4 |
Author
| Aaron T. McLaughlin | 1 |
| Ben Kelcey | 1 |
| Daniel McNeish | 1 |
| Daryl R. Van Tongeren | 1 |
| Jennifer Oser | 1 |
| Johan Lyrvall | 1 |
| Kevin J. Grimm | 1 |
| Mark H. C. Lai | 1 |
| Patrick D. Manapat | 1 |
| Roberto Di Mari | 1 |
| Russell P. Houpt | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Russell P. Houpt; Kevin J. Grimm; Aaron T. McLaughlin; Daryl R. Van Tongeren – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Numerous methods exist to determine the optimal number of classes when using latent profile analysis (LPA), but none are consistently correct. Recently, the likelihood incremental percentage per parameter (LI3P) was proposed as a model effect-size measure. To evaluate the LI3P more thoroughly, we simulated 50,000 datasets, manipulating factors…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Profiles, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Johan Lyrvall; Zsuzsa Bakk; Jennifer Oser; Roberto Di Mari – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
We present a bias-adjusted three-step estimation approach for multilevel latent class models (LC) with covariates. The proposed approach involves (1) fitting a single-level measurement model while ignoring the multilevel structure, (2) assigning units to latent classes, and (3) fitting the multilevel model with the covariates while controlling for…
Descriptors: Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Statistical Bias, Error of Measurement, Simulation
Daniel McNeish; Patrick D. Manapat – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A recent review found that 11% of published factor models are hierarchical models with second-order factors. However, dedicated recommendations for evaluating hierarchical model fit have yet to emerge. Traditional benchmarks like RMSEA <0.06 or CFI >0.95 are often consulted, but they were never intended to generalize to hierarchical models.…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Benchmarking
Yuanfang Liu; Mark H. C. Lai; Ben Kelcey – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Measurement invariance holds when a latent construct is measured in the same way across different levels of background variables (continuous or categorical) while controlling for the true value of that construct. Using Monte Carlo simulation, this paper compares the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model and MIMIC-interaction to a…
Descriptors: Classification, Accuracy, Error of Measurement, Correlation

Peer reviewed
Direct link
