Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Scoring Formulas | 3 |
| Interrater Reliability | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Answer Keys | 1 |
| Answer Sheets | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Educational Practices | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bardhoshi, Gerta | 1 |
| Cirillo, Pier F. | 1 |
| Cohen, Allan | 1 |
| Erford, Bradley T. | 1 |
| Merrel, Jeremy D. | 1 |
| Raczynski, Kevin | 1 |
| Schwartz, Pauline M. | 1 |
| Webb, Jeffrey A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 7 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkRaczynski, Kevin; Cohen, Allan – Applied Measurement in Education, 2018
The literature on Automated Essay Scoring (AES) systems has provided useful validation frameworks for any assessment that includes AES scoring. Furthermore, evidence for the scoring fidelity of AES systems is accumulating. Yet questions remain when appraising the scoring performance of AES systems. These questions include: (a) which essays are…
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Test Scoring Machines, Test Validity, Evaluators
Bardhoshi, Gerta; Erford, Bradley T. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2017
Precision is a key facet of test development, with score reliability determined primarily according to the types of error one wants to approximate and demonstrate. This article identifies and discusses several primary forms of reliability estimation: internal consistency (i.e., split-half, KR-20, a), test-retest, alternate forms, interscorer, and…
Descriptors: Scores, Test Reliability, Accuracy, Pretests Posttests
Download full textMerrel, Jeremy D.; Cirillo, Pier F.; Schwartz, Pauline M.; Webb, Jeffrey A. – Higher Education Studies, 2015
Multiple choice testing is a common but often ineffective method for evaluating learning. A newer approach, however, using Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF AT®, Epstein Educational Enterprise, Inc.) forms, offers several advantages. In particular, a student learns immediately if his or her answer is correct and, in the case of an…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Feedback (Response), Evaluation Methods, Guessing (Tests)
