Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Age Differences | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
Norm Referenced Tests | 3 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Clinical Diagnosis | 1 |
Construct Validity | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Cross Age Teaching | 1 |
Curriculum Based Assessment | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Conlin, N. | 1 |
Connelly, Vincent | 1 |
Critten, Sarah | 1 |
Dockrell, Julie E. | 1 |
Lawrence, Carol W. | 1 |
McGavock, K. | 1 |
Thurston, A. | 1 |
Topping, K. J. | 1 |
Walter, Kirsty | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
United Kingdom (Scotland) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dockrell, Julie E.; Connelly, Vincent; Walter, Kirsty; Critten, Sarah – British Educational Research Journal, 2015
The assessment of children's writing raises technical and practical challenges. In this paper we examine the potential use of a curriculum based measure for writing (CBM-W) to assess the written texts of pupils in Key Stage 2 (M age 107 months, range 88 to 125). Two hundred and thirty six Year three, five and six pupils completed a standardized…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Writing Assignments, Writing (Composition), Standardized Tests
Topping, K. J.; Thurston, A.; McGavock, K.; Conlin, N. – Educational Research, 2012
Background: Large-scale randomised controlled trials are relatively rare in education. The present study approximates to, but is not exactly, a randomised controlled trial. It was an attempt to scale up previous small peer tutoring projects, while investing only modestly in continuing professional development for teachers. Purpose: A two-year…
Descriptors: Peer Teaching, Tutoring, Readability, Reading Ability

Lawrence, Carol W. – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1992
This article reviews the concept and derivation of age-equivalent scores as evidence for speech-language deficits. It presents arguments against the use of age-equivalent scores in case management decisions and recommends that, when used, a report include a clear explanation of their true meaning and other summaries of test performance. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Clinical Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods