Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Learning Objectives | 2 |
Technology Uses in Education | 2 |
Undergraduate Study | 2 |
Anatomy | 1 |
Best Practices | 1 |
Curriculum Design | 1 |
Curriculum Implementation | 1 |
Educational Quality | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Gregory J. Crowther | 1 |
Kelly M. Hennessey | 1 |
Marcus M. Lawrence | 1 |
Marianne Miserandino | 1 |
Merrill D. Funk | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Marianne Miserandino – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) presents challenges and opportunities for higher education. The challenge is to incorporate the benefits of AI while minimizing its potential for misuse and undermining of learning. The opportunity is that AI allows instructors to assess learning authentically by fostering creative, engaging, realistic,…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Evaluation Methods, Undergraduate Study
Gregory J. Crowther; Merrill D. Funk; Kelly M. Hennessey; Marcus M. Lawrence – Advances in Physiology Education, 2025
Learning objectives (LOs) are a pillar of course design and execution and thus a focus of curricular reforms. This study explored the extent to which the creation and usage of LOs might be facilitated by three leading chatbots: ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Google Gemini Advanced. We posed three main questions, as follows: "question…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Learning Objectives, Technology Uses in Education, Curriculum Design