Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Audits (Verification) | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
Program Validation | 3 |
Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
Program Evaluation | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Coding | 1 |
Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Divan, Aysha | 1 |
Lancaster, Matthew K. | 1 |
Murphy, Brian P. | 1 |
Ross, Samuel R. P-J. | 1 |
Swanson, Richard A. | 1 |
Volz, Veronica | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
A Generalizable Framework for Multi-Scale Auditing of Digital Learning Provision in Higher Education
Ross, Samuel R. P-J.; Volz, Veronica; Lancaster, Matthew K.; Divan, Aysha – Online Learning, 2018
It is increasingly important that higher education institutions be able to audit and evaluate the scope and efficacy of their digital learning resources across various scales. To date there has been little effort to address this need for a validated, appropriate, and simple-to-execute method that will facilitate such an audit, whether it be at the…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Audits (Verification), Electronic Learning, Educational Resources
OECD Publishing (NJ1), 2012
The "PISA 2009 Technical Report" describes the methodology underlying the PISA 2009 survey. It examines additional features related to the implementation of the project at a level of detail that allows researchers to understand and replicate its analyses. The reader will find a wealth of information on the test and sample design,…
Descriptors: Quality Control, Research Reports, Research Methodology, Evaluation Criteria
Murphy, Brian P.; Swanson, Richard A. – 1987
Although there are many reasons to evaluate training and development (T & D) programs, it is often time-consuming and expensive to do so. However, evaluations can be conducted by an auditing approach. The auditing approach to evaluating T & D offers three advantages. Auditing is quicker and less expensive than traditional methods, and it uses a…
Descriptors: Audits (Verification), Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods