Descriptor
| College Instruction | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Information Utilization | 2 |
| Student Evaluation | 2 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| Educational Objectives | 1 |
| Intellectual Disciplines | 1 |
| National Norms | 1 |
| Test Format | 1 |
| Test Reliability | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Teaching… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWergin, Jon F. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1988
Each of the many methods or approaches to assessing student learning is based on a clear understanding of validity, reliability, course objectives, the advantages and disadvantages of different evaluation formats, and the ways assessment data will be used to improve instruction. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedCarpenter, C. Blaine; Doig, James C. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1988
There are now established methods and models to assess critical thinking in any discipline. The approach selected will depend on how critical thinking is defined, whether national norms are needed, and how the results will be used. (Author)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Critical Thinking, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
