Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 6 |
Evaluation Methods | 6 |
Judges | 5 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Debate | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Questionnaires | 2 |
College Faculty | 1 |
Continuing Education Centers | 1 |
Court Judges | 1 |
Court Litigation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bramley, Tom | 1 |
Crisp, Victoria | 1 |
Dudczak, Craig A. | 1 |
Fadely, Dean | 1 |
Novakovic, Nadezda | 1 |
Reckase, Mark D. | 1 |
Rogers, Julia S. | 1 |
Turner, Gloria A. | 1 |
Vitello, Sylvia | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 2 |
Alabama | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bramley, Tom; Vitello, Sylvia – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2019
Comparative Judgement (CJ) is an increasingly widely investigated method in assessment for creating a scale, for example of the quality of essays. One area that has attracted attention in CJ studies is the optimisation of the selection of pairs of objects for judgement. One approach is known as adaptive comparative judgement (ACJ). It has been…
Descriptors: Reliability, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Essay Tests
Crisp, Victoria; Novakovic, Nadezda – Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 2009
The consistency of assessment demands is important to validity. This research investigated the comparability of the demands of college-assessed units within a vocationally related qualification, drawing on methodological approaches that have previously been used to compare assessments. Assessment materials from five colleges were obtained. After…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Qualifications, Task Analysis, Item Analysis
Dudczak, Craig A.; And Others – 1992
A study assessed the predictive validity of two substantially different instruments (a questionnaire or a philosophy statement) which may be used to predict critics' ballot behavior in Cross Examination Debate Association (CEDA) debate. Questionnaires were distributed to 29 debate tournaments across the United States for completion by critics…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Debate, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Reckase, Mark D. – 1994
Comparative results are presented for procedures recently appearing in literature related to standard setting on the National Assessment of Educational Progress--the paper selection method and the contrasting group method. For this comparison, a probabilistic model with normal distribution of performance and a six-point scale were assumed. The…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criteria, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education
Rogers, Julia S.; Turner, Gloria A. – 1986
This study, undertaken in the summer of 1986, was to develop a comprehensive evaluation and needs assessment for the Alabama Judicial College. Qualitative research techniques (participant observation and in-depth interviewing) were applied to collect the necessary data. Judicial employees were observed in courtroom, office, training and social…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Continuing Education Centers, Court Judges, Evaluation Methods
Fadely, Dean – 1982
College debaters who go to law school are often surprised by the differences between the processes that take place in the court of reason and the process that takes place in the court of law. The court of reason relies mainly on authoritative testimony, while the court of law relies on direct evidence. Evidence in the court of reason is either…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Court Litigation, Court Role, Debate