NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Elementary Education2
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Spyridoula Varlokosta; Katerina Fragkopoulou; Dimitra Arfani; Christina Manouilidou – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2024
Background: The detection and description of language impairments in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's Disease (AD) play an important role in research, clinical diagnosis and intervention. Various methodological protocols have been implemented for the assessment of morphosyntactic abilities in AD; narrative discourse elicitation tasks…
Descriptors: Morphology (Languages), Syntax, Alzheimers Disease, Speech Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Park, Yeonggwang; Anand, Supraja; Ozmeral, Erol J.; Shrivastav, Rahul; Eddins, David A. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2022
Purpose: Vocal roughness is often present in many voice disorders but the assessment of roughness mainly depends on the subjective auditory-perceptual evaluation and lacks acoustic correlates. This study aimed to apply the concept of roughness in general sound quality perception to vocal roughness assessment and to characterize the relationship…
Descriptors: Voice Disorders, Evaluation Methods, Auditory Perception, Acoustics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leaman, Marion C.; Edmonds, Lisa A. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2021
Purpose: This study evaluated interrater reliability (IRR) and test-retest stability (TRTS) of seven linguistic measures (percent correct information units, relevance, subject-verb-[object], complete utterance, grammaticality, referential cohesion, global coherence), and communicative success in unstructured conversation and in a story narrative…
Descriptors: Aphasia, Psychometrics, Correlation, Speech Language Pathology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pratt, Amy S.; Anaya, Jissel B.; Ramos, Michelle N.; Pham, Giang; Muñoz, Miriam; Bedore, Lisa M.; Peña, Elizabeth D. – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2022
Purpose: Our proof-of-concept study tested the feasibility of virtual testing using child assessments that were originally validated for in-person testing only. Method: Ten adult-child dyads were assigned to complete both in-person and virtual tests of language, cognition, and narratives. Child participants fell between the ages of 4 and 8 years;…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Language Tests, Intelligence Tests, Narration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ingram, David; Dubasik, Virginia L. – Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2011
Multidimensional analysis involves moving away from one-dimensional analyses such as most articulation tests to comprehensive analyses involving levels of phonological information from the word level down to segments. This article outlines one such approach that looks at four levels from words to segments, using nine phonological measures. It also…
Descriptors: Phonology, Speech Evaluation, Children, Siblings
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Burrows, Lauren; Goldstein, Brian A. – Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2010
Phonological acquisition traditionally has been measured using constructs that focus on segments rather than the whole words. Findings from recent research have suggested whole-word productions be evaluated using measures such as phonological mean length of utterance (pMLU) and the proportion of whole-word proximity (PWP). These measures have been…
Descriptors: Phonemes, Monolingualism, Bilingualism, English
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Glaspey, Amy M.; MacLeod, Andrea A. N. – Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2010
The purpose of the current study is to document phonological change from a multidimensional perspective for a 3-year-old boy with phonological disorder by comparing three measures: (1) accuracy of consonant productions, (2) dynamic assessment, and (3) acoustic analysis. The methods included collecting a sample of the targets /s, [image omitted],…
Descriptors: Cues, Phonetic Transcription, Acoustics, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gordon-Brannan, Mary – Topics in Language Disorders, 1994
The three general approaches for measuring speech intelligibility in young children are open-set word identification, closed-set word identification, and rating scales. Positive and negative aspects of the various procedures for measuring speech intelligibility are discussed. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Articulation Impairments, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fukawa, Teruyo; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1988
Forty stutterers and forty nonstutterers in Japan were tested for susceptibility to delayed auditory feedback while reading passages under amplified delay conditions. Susceptibility was higher for stutterers than nonstutterers and for nonstuttering men than nonstuttering women. Stutterers appeared to rely on auditory feedback for speech control…
Descriptors: Adults, Auditory Perception, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pye, Clifton; And Others – Journal of Child Language, 1988
Analysis and comparison of three independent transcriptions of the same speech sample collected from a hearing child with deaf parents resulted in two descriptions of the child's phonological system--one based on a liberal estimate and the other a conservative estimate of the potential error in the transcripts. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Child Language, Comparative Analysis, Deafness, Error Analysis (Language)