NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 288 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seraji, Farhad; Ansari, Saied; Chosarih, Muhammad Reza Yousefzadeh – Education and Information Technologies, 2023
Increasing children's access to media has attached greater significance to media literacy education, the content and methods of which have changed with media development. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) method on media literacy competencies in elementary students. To this end, 95 female sixth-grade…
Descriptors: Media Literacy, Communities of Practice, Elementary School Students, Literacy Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hyemin Yoon; HyunJin Kim; Sangjin Kim – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2024
We have maintained the customer grade system that is being implemented to customers with excellent performance through customer segmentation for years. Currently, financial institutions that operate the customer grade system provide similar services based on the score calculation criteria, but the score calculation criteria vary from the financial…
Descriptors: Classification, Artificial Intelligence, Prediction, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marine Simon; Alexandra Budke – Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 2024
Comparison is an important geographic method and a common task in geography education. Mastering comparison is a complex competency and written comparisons are challenging tasks both for students and assessors. As yet, however, there is no set test for evaluating comparison competency nor tool for enhancing it. Moreover, little is known about…
Descriptors: Geography Instruction, Student Evaluation, Comparative Analysis, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelly, Kate Tremain; Richardson, Mary; Isaacs, Talia – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2022
Comparative judgment is gaining popularity as an assessment tool, including for high-stakes testing purposes, despite relatively little research on the use of the technique. Advocates claim two main rationales for its use: that comparative judgment is valid because humans are better at comparative than absolute judgment, and because it distils the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Evaluative Thinking, High Stakes Tests
Gill, Tim – Research Matters, 2022
In Comparative Judgement (CJ) exercises, examiners are asked to look at a selection of candidate scripts (with marks removed) and order them in terms of which they believe display the best quality. By including scripts from different examination sessions, the results of these exercises can be used to help with maintaining standards. Results from…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Scripts, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Weidlich, Joshua; Gaševic, Dragan; Drachsler, Hendrik – Journal of Learning Analytics, 2022
As a research field geared toward understanding and improving learning, Learning Analytics (LA) must be able to provide empirical support for causal claims. However, as a highly applied field, tightly controlled randomized experiments are not always feasible nor desirable. Instead, researchers often rely on observational data, based on which they…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Inferences, Learning Analytics, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Guler, Gul; Cikrikci, Rahime Nukhet – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2022
The purpose of this study was to investigate the Type I Error findings and power rates of the methods used to determine dimensionality in unidimensional and bidimensional psychological constructs for various conditions (characteristic of the distribution, sample size, length of the test, and interdimensional correlation) and to examine the joint…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Decision Making, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davis, Kirsten A.; Jesiek, Brent K.; Knight, David B. – Journal of Engineering Education, 2023
Background: Engineers operate in an increasingly global environment, making it important that engineering students develop global engineering competency to prepare them for success in the workplace. To understand this learning, we need assessment approaches that go beyond traditional self-report surveys. A previous study (Jesiek et al.,…
Descriptors: Vignettes, Engineering Education, Study Abroad, Foreign Countries
Walland, Emma – Research Matters, 2022
In this article, I report on examiners' views and experiences of using Pairwise Comparative Judgement (PCJ) and Rank Ordering (RO) as alternatives to traditional analytical marking for GCSE English Language essays. Fifteen GCSE English Language examiners took part in the study. After each had judged 100 pairs of essays using PCJ and eight packs of…
Descriptors: Essays, Grading, Writing Evaluation, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Figliano, Fred J.; Wells, John G. – Journal of Technology Education, 2019
This study outlines the development of the Design Log Instrument (DLI), which is intended for use in identifying moments of abstraction as evidence of STEM content knowledge transfer. The DLI prompts participants to be reflective during technological/engineering design challenges. During the development of this instrument, a three-phase,…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Transfer of Training, Engineering Education, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sims, Sam; Anders, Jake; Zieger, Laura – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2022
Comparative interrupted time series (CITS) designs evaluate impact by modeling the relative deviation from trends among a treatment and comparison group after an intervention. The broad applicability of the design means it is widely used in education research. Like all non-experimental evaluation methods however, the internal validity of a given…
Descriptors: Validity, Comparative Analysis, Statistical Analysis, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davies, Ben; Miller, David; Infante, Nicole – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2023
We report on a series of task-based interviews in which nine mathematicians were asked to evaluate a series of six mathematical arguments, purportedly produced either by fellow mathematicians or undergraduate students. In this paper, we attend to the role of context in mathematicians' responses, leading to four themes in expectations when…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Validity, Mathematical Logic, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Azman Ong, Mohd Hanafi; Mohd Yasin, Norazlina; Ibrahim, Nur Syafikah – Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 2022
Purpose: Measuring internal response of online learning is seen as fundamental to absorptive capacity which stimulates knowledge assimilation. However, the evaluation of practice and research of validated instruments that could effectively measure online learning response behavior is limited. Thus, in this study, a new instrument was designed…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Student Surveys, Student Attitudes, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lu, Xiaofei,; Wu, Jifeng – Modern Language Journal, 2022
This study proposed a set of measures for assessing noun phrase (NP) complexity in second language (L2) Chinese writing and compared the predictive power of these measures for L2 Chinese writing quality to that of a set of syntactic complexity measures based on the topic-comment unit (TC-unit). Our data consisted of 101 narratives written by…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Syntax, Chinese, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marshall, Neil; Shaw, Kirsten; Hunter, Jodie; Jones, Ian – New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 2020
There is growing interest in using comparative judgement to assess student work as an alternative to traditional marking. Comparative judgement requires no rubrics and is instead grounded in experts making pairwise judgements about the relative 'quality' of students' work according to a high level criterion. The resulting decision data are fitted…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  20