Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Software Evaluation | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Field Tests | 2 |
| Academic Libraries | 1 |
| Check Lists | 1 |
| Computer Science | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Consortia | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Descriptive Linguistics | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Rhode Island | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cohen, Kevin Bretonnel – ProQuest LLC, 2010
Although software testing has been well-studied in computer science, it has received little attention in natural language processing. Nonetheless, a fully developed methodology for glass box evaluation and testing of language processing applications already exists in the field methods of descriptive linguistics. This work lays out a number of…
Descriptors: Testing, Computer Software, Quality Control, Computer Science
Peer reviewedHryciw-Wing, Carol A. – Library Software Review, 1992
A consortia of Rhode Island academic libraries used several research methods--checklists, vendor matrix, vendor demonstrations, dial-up access, on-site visits, and telephone conversations with representatives--to evaluate integrated library systems for purchase. With the help of private funding, INNOPAC was purchased and implemented. (EA)
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Check Lists, Computer Software Evaluation, Consortia

Direct link
