Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Educational Policy | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
Program Validation | 3 |
Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
Academic Failure | 1 |
Academic Records | 1 |
Accountability | 1 |
Achievement Gap | 1 |
Age Grade Placement | 1 |
Criterion Referenced Tests | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Brandt, Mary E. | 1 |
Ford, Marilyn | 1 |
Grace, Donna | 1 |
Jewels, Tony | 1 |
Jones, Wendy | 1 |
Saliba, Jim | 1 |
Warren, John Robert | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Warren, John Robert; Saliba, Jim – Educational Researcher, 2012
How many students repeat a grade each year? How do retention rates vary across states and over time? Despite extensive research on the predictors and consequences of grade retention, there is no systematic way to quantify state-level retention rates; even national estimates rely on imperfect proxy measures. We present a conceptually simple…
Descriptors: Grade Repetition, School Holding Power, Public Education, National Surveys
Jewels, Tony; Ford, Marilyn; Jones, Wendy – Journal of Information Technology Education, 2007
In tertiary institutions in Australia, and no doubt elsewhere, there is increasing pressure for accountability. No longer are academics assumed "a priori" to be responsible and capable of self management in teaching and assessing the subjects they run. Procedures are being dictated more from the "top down". Although academics…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Information Technology, Foreign Countries, Criterion Referenced Tests
Brandt, Mary E.; Grace, Donna – Educational Perspectives, 2005
The purpose of this article is to develop, validate, and field test two readiness assessment instruments, "Schools Ready for Children" and "Children Ready for School." The authors first describe the development of the assessment instrument dealing with policies and practices of "ready" schools. The items on this…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Learning Readiness, School Readiness, Program Validation