NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 87 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pollard, Alison; Forss, Kim – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
Quality Assessment Frameworks (QAFs) are standardized templates that include pre-defined criteria, open questions, or a combination to assess the quality of evaluations. They support organizations to limit risks associated with poor-quality evaluation. Qualitative research focused on four QAFs shows that five dimensions of quality are assessed…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Guidelines, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Robertson, Royce L.; Larki, Martha J. – Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 2019
Maturity models fill the need for a measure of overall growth in how outcomes assessment is defined and how feedback informs improvement to meet internal and external expectations at individual institutions of higher education. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted to develop an instrument, the Assessment System Maturity Matrix (ASMM), to…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Higher Education, Evaluation Methods, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gates, Emily F. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Evaluation is defined by its central task of valuing--the process and product of judging the merit, worth, or significance of a policy or program. However, there are no clear-cut ways to consider values and render value judgments in evaluation practice. There remains contention in the evaluation field about whether and how to make value judgments.…
Descriptors: Heuristics, Value Judgment, Values, Systems Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomas, Veronica G.; Parsons, Beverly A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
The authors of this article each bring a different theoretical background to their evaluation practice. The first author has a background of attention to culturally responsive evaluation (CRE), while the second author has a background of attention to systems theories and their application to evaluation. Both have had their own evolution of…
Descriptors: Culturally Relevant Education, Educational Practices, Evaluation Methods, Alignment (Education)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Praslova, Ludmila – Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2010
Assessment of educational effectiveness provides vitally important feedback to Institutions of Higher Education. It also provides important information to external stakeholders, such as prospective students, parents, governmental and local regulatory entities, professional and regional accrediting organizations, and representatives of the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Higher Education, Program Evaluation, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van Mierlo, Barbara; Arkesteijn, Marlen; Leeuwis, Cees – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
Networks aiming for fundamental changes bring together a variety of actors who are part and parcel of a problematic context. These system innovation projects need to be accompanied by a monitoring and evaluation approach that supports and maintains reflexivity to be able to deal with uncertainties and conflicts while challenging current practices…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Program Descriptions, Program Implementation, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Behrens, Teresa R.; Kelly, Thomas – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
An overview is presented of forces that have shaped how public and private funders approach evaluation, including the challenges that funders, and particularly foundations, face in effectively using evaluation within an organizational learning framework. Even with internal organizational challenges to learning, foundations are increasingly…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Program Evaluation, Measurement, Philanthropic Foundations
Randall, Robert S. – Educ Technol, 1969
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Systems Approach
Martin, James L. – 1975
Criteria sets are a necessary step in the systematic development of evaluation in education. Evaluation results from the combination of criteria and evidence. There is a need to develop explicit tools for evaluating criteria, similar to those used in evaluating evidence. The formulation of such criteria depends on distinguishing between terms…
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Yoda, Koji – Educational Planning, 1973
The proposed evaluation model provides for the assignment of relative weights to each criterion, and establishes a weighting system for calculating a quantitative-qualitative raw score for each service activity of a faculty member being reviewed. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burke, Ken – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1977
Recommends a functional/experiential approach to analysis and judgment of multimedia presentations, emphasizing structure and style of presentation, technical and aesthetic factors, value to the audience, and the critic's personal reactions. (VT)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Educational Media, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Landrith, Harold E. – 1977
An effective personnel evaluation system should contain ten components: (1) an introduction including the selection and composition of the committee that develops the program and the procedures used in its development; (2) a philosophy of evaluation based upon an assessment of the teaching environment of the district; (3) a listing of the purposes…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Petrie, Hugh G. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1982
The rupture between evaluation and action is seen as a failure to take a systems view of the situation. Both the organization and the proposed evaluation program must be understood as interactive systems, which mesh with, rather than oppose, each other if they are appropriately designed and implemented. (MLW)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Eide, Kjell – Educational Planning, 1973
Discusses various systems models and examines the conditions under which one educational system can be said to be better than another. (WM)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Educational Planning, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Condelli, Larry – 1996
Implementation of quality indicators in the evaluation of adult education programs of 49 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico was examined. The study focused on development of measures and standards for the indicators and the impact of quality indicators on state accountability systems and program quality. Most states had completed…
Descriptors: Accountability, Adult Education, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6