NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Trochim, William M.; Marcus, Stephen E.; Masse, Louise C.; Moser, Richard P.; Weld, Patrick C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
Over the past few decades there has been a rise in the number of federally funded large scientific research initiatives, with increased calls to evaluate their processes and outcomes. This article describes efforts to evaluate such initiatives in one agency within the U.S. federal government. The authors introduce the Evaluation of Large…
Descriptors: Concept Mapping, Scientific Research, Peer Evaluation, Logical Thinking
General Accounting Office, Washington, DC. Program Evaluation and Methodology Div. – 1988
The General Accounting Office (GAO) examined the feasibility of assessing the quality of the federal civilian work force, focusing on professional and administrative staff. The agency developed a measurable definition of quality centered on attributes of the individual and the match of the individual's capabilities to the needs of the job. It…
Descriptors: Ability, Administrators, Adults, Employment Qualifications
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chelimsky, Eleanor – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
Evaluation management requires a system for measuring, improving, and accounting for quality. The Institute for Program Evaluation in the United States General Accounting Office is developing such a system. (Author)
Descriptors: Administration, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
St. Pierre, Robert G. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
The degree of control that project directors exert over the technical direction of evaluations and the selection of evaluation staff is examined, and the way in which control has grown and shrunk over the past decade is considered. (Author)
Descriptors: Administration, Contracts, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Bollag, Burton – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2006
When the federal Commission on the Future of Higher Education delivered its final report to the secretary of education in September, accreditors and many higher-education leaders breathed a small sigh of relief. The document did not endorse an early recommendation that the current accreditation system be completely dismantled. Now, though, just a…
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Higher Education, Quality Control, Academic Standards