Descriptor
Disabilities | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Graphs | 2 |
Individualized Education… | 2 |
Instructional Effectiveness | 2 |
Measurement Techniques | 2 |
Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
Precision Teaching | 2 |
Predictive Measurement | 2 |
Student Evaluation | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Exceptional Children | 2 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 2 |
Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Koorland, Mark A.; Nelson, C. Michael – Exceptional Children, 1990
This critique discusses conceptual and practical issues raised in a paper by D. Marston (EC 210 837) on choosing the most technically adequate graph for measuring progress on individual education plans. The critique argues that the Standard Behavior Chart is a technically adequate and useful measurement tool. (JDD)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Graphs

Marston, Douglas; Deno, Stanley L. – Exceptional Children, 1990
This article responds to a criticism (EC 231 964) of a paper that discusses graphs for measuring progress on individual education plans (EC 210 837). It notes that the type of chart used is not a major issue; the important point is that teachers repeatedly gather data on educationally relevant tasks and evaluate intervention effectiveness. (JDD)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Graphs