Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 7 |
| Information Dissemination | 7 |
| Program Validation | 7 |
| Demonstration Programs | 6 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 5 |
| Needs Assessment | 5 |
| Program Evaluation | 5 |
| Program Development | 4 |
| Program Effectiveness | 4 |
| Career Education | 3 |
| Consortia | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Evaluation and… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education Amendments 1974 | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textCovert, Robert W.; Fang, Wei Li – 1981
The Joint Dissemination Review Panel (JDRP) examines educational interventions and determines their effectiveness. This study's purpose was to assess this review process and identify common characteristics of submittals and ways in which approvals and rejections differed. A locally-developed instrument which collected data on the intervention's…
Descriptors: Demonstration Programs, Educational Practices, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Nebraska Univ., Omaha. Center for Urban Education. – 1977
A shift in the priorities set down in the Teacher Corps' rules increases the amount of time and attention paid to local projects rather than to large programs. Three Teacher Corps task forces convened to study the implications of the new rules and the realities of local project operation. The reports of the task forces are contained in this…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Demonstration Programs, Educational Needs, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedWalberg, Herbert J.; Niemiec, Richard P. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1993
Several validation methods for the identification and dissemination of exemplary educational programs are explored, and the rationales for methods developed by the Program Effectiveness Panel are discussed. Comparative advantages and disadvantages of four selected methods are reviewed, and recommendations are made for policymakers and…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Curriculum Evaluation, Demonstration Programs, Elementary Secondary Education
Far West Lab. for Educational Research and Development, San Francisco, CA. – 1981
This handbook provides suggestions about quality control procedures that will enable Teacher Corps project personnel to assess the effects and success of educational products, practices, and other outputs prior to dissemination. Two assessment processes are outlined. The first, review, is the collegial ongoing process for Teacher Corps project…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Educational Innovation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Wisconsin State Dept. of Public Instruction, Madison. – 1976
Seven Wisconsin school districts formed a consortium to improve district level implementation of career education, K-12. Each district developed assessment and/or evaluation instruments to meet their specific needs, and circulated these instruments among all seven districts for review and feedback. After revision and field testing, these…
Descriptors: Career Education, Consortia, Demonstration Programs, Elementary Secondary Education
Wisconsin State Dept. of Public Instruction, Madison. – 1976
Seven Wisconsin school districts formed a consortium to improve district level implementation of career education, K-12. Each district developed assessment and/or evaluation instruments to meet their specific needs, and circulated these instruments among all seven districts for review and feedback. After revision and field testing, these…
Descriptors: Career Education, Consortia, Data Collection, Demonstration Programs
Third Party Evaluation Report for the Wisconsin Career Education Consortium, Project No. 554AH50646.
Halfin, Harold; And Others – 1976
Seven Wisconsin school districts formed a consortium to improve district level implementation of career education, K-12. Each district developed assessment and/or evaluation instruments to meet their specific needs, and circulated these instruments among all seven districts for review and feedback. After revision and field testing, these…
Descriptors: Career Education, Consortia, Data Analysis, Data Collection
