Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Bayesian Statistics | 9 |
Evaluation Methods | 9 |
Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 9 |
Comparative Analysis | 5 |
Computation | 3 |
Item Response Theory | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Attribution Theory | 2 |
Error of Measurement | 2 |
Sample Size | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Amota Ataneka | 1 |
Ben Kelcey | 1 |
Bergeman, C. S. | 1 |
Bloom, Howard S. | 1 |
Chen, Lisue | 1 |
Clapper, Eli-Boaz | 1 |
Edwards, Julianne M. | 1 |
Fangxing Bai | 1 |
Finch, Holmes | 1 |
Gao, Furong | 1 |
Hamaker, Ellen | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Yasuhiro Yamamoto; Yasuo Miyazaki – Journal of Experimental Education, 2025
Bayesian methods have been said to solve small sample problems in frequentist methods by reflecting prior knowledge in the prior distribution. However, there are dangers in strongly reflecting prior knowledge or situations where much prior knowledge cannot be used. In order to address the issue, in this article, we considered to apply two Bayesian…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Bayesian Statistics, Prior Learning
Van Lissa, Caspar J.; van Erp, Sara; Clapper, Eli-Boaz – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
When meta-analyzing heterogeneous bodies of literature, meta-regression can be used to account for potentially relevant between-studies differences. A key challenge is that the number of candidate moderators is often high relative to the number of studies. This introduces risks of overfitting, spurious results, and model non-convergence. To…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Regression (Statistics), Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Meta Analysis
Ben Kelcey; Fangxing Bai; Amota Ataneka; Yanli Xie; Kyle Cox – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2024
We develop a structural after measurement (SAM) method for structural equation models (SEMs) that accommodates missing data. The results show that the proposed SAM missing data estimator outperforms conventional full information (FI) estimators in terms of convergence, bias, and root-mean-square-error in small-to-moderate samples or large samples…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Research Problems, Error of Measurement, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Wyse, Adam E. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2017
This article illustrates five different methods for estimating Angoff cut scores using item response theory (IRT) models. These include maximum likelihood (ML), expected a priori (EAP), modal a priori (MAP), and weighted maximum likelihood (WML) estimators, as well as the most commonly used approach based on translating ratings through the test…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Item Response Theory, Bayesian Statistics, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Bloom, Howard S.; Raudenbush, Stephen W.; Weiss, Michael J.; Porter, Kristin – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2017
The present article considers a fundamental question in evaluation research: "By how much do program effects vary across sites?" The article first presents a theoretical model of cross-site impact variation and a related estimation model with a random treatment coefficient and fixed site-specific intercepts. This approach eliminates…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Program Evaluation, Welfare Services, Employment
Finch, Holmes; Edwards, Julianne M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
Standard approaches for estimating item response theory (IRT) model parameters generally work under the assumption that the latent trait being measured by a set of items follows the normal distribution. Estimation of IRT parameters in the presence of nonnormal latent traits has been shown to generate biased person and item parameter estimates. A…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Computation, Nonparametric Statistics, Bayesian Statistics
Mahmud, Jumailiyah; Sutikno, Muzayanah; Naga, Dali S. – Educational Research and Reviews, 2016
The aim of this study is to determine variance difference between maximum likelihood and expected A posteriori estimation methods viewed from number of test items of aptitude test. The variance presents an accuracy generated by both maximum likelihood and Bayes estimation methods. The test consists of three subtests, each with 40 multiple-choice…
Descriptors: Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Computation, Item Response Theory, Test Items
Wang, Lijuan; Hamaker, Ellen; Bergeman, C. S. – Psychological Methods, 2012
Intra-individual variability over a short period of time may contain important information about how individuals differ from each other. In this article we begin by discussing diverse indicators for quantifying intra-individual variability and indicate their advantages and disadvantages. Then we propose an alternative method that models…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Data Analysis, Individual Differences, Models
Gao, Furong; Chen, Lisue – Applied Measurement in Education, 2005
Through a large-scale simulation study, this article compares item parameter estimates obtained by the marginal maximum likelihood estimation (MMLE) and marginal Bayes modal estimation (MBME) procedures in the 3-parameter logistic model. The impact of different prior specifications on the MBME estimates is also investigated using carefully…
Descriptors: Simulation, Computation, Bayesian Statistics, Item Analysis