Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Performance Factors | 3 |
| Sampling | 3 |
| Case Studies | 2 |
| Research Methodology | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Child Care | 1 |
| Child Development | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Davis, Elizabeth E. | 1 |
| Foley, Ellen | 1 |
| Grobe, Deana | 1 |
| Komaki, Judith L. | 1 |
| Mishook, Jacob | 1 |
| Supovitz, Jonathan | 1 |
| Weber, Roberta B. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Davis, Elizabeth E.; Grobe, Deana; Weber, Roberta B. – Administration for Children & Families, 2012
In this paper we discuss several key challenges encountered when conducting a study of the continuity of participation in the child care subsidy program. While many of these issues are familiar to those who have studied participation dynamics in other assistance programs, and to those familiar with survival analysis, we describe these challenges…
Descriptors: Child Care, Grants, Low Income Groups, Participation
Supovitz, Jonathan; Foley, Ellen; Mishook, Jacob – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2012
Data have long been considered a key factor in organizational decision-making (Simon, 1955; Lindblom & Cohen, 1979). Data offer perspective, guidance, and insights that inform policy and practice (Newell & Simon, 1972; Kennedy, 1984). Recently, education policymakers have invested in the use of data for organizational improvement in states…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Politics of Education, Educational Indicators, Management Information Systems
Peer reviewedKomaki, Judith L. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1998
Five criteria are proposed for evaluating performance in research studies: the directness of sampling, the responsiveness of the target, the reliability of the observers, the frequent assessment of the target during the intervention period, and the critical nature of the target. A case study illustrates effectiveness of the criteria. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Data Analysis, Disabilities, Evaluation Criteria


