Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 6 |
Inferences | 6 |
Standardized Tests | 6 |
Measurement Techniques | 3 |
Test Validity | 3 |
Construct Validity | 2 |
Knowledge Level | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Student Evaluation | 2 |
Test Bias | 2 |
Test Construction | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Research and… | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Journal of Educational and… | 1 |
Journal of Special Education | 1 |
Learning Disabilities: A… | 1 |
Author
Anderson, Daniel | 1 |
Briggs, Derek C. | 1 |
Cheng, Britte H. | 1 |
Colker, Alexis M. | 1 |
DeBarger, Angela | 1 |
Facione, Peter A. | 1 |
Farley, Dan | 1 |
Gonzalez-Valenzuela,… | 1 |
Gravel, Jenna | 1 |
Haertel, Geneva | 1 |
Mislevy, Robert J. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Technical difficulties and other unforeseen events occasionally lead to incomplete data on educational tests, which necessitates the reporting of imputed scores to some examinees. While there exist several approaches for reporting imputed scores, there is a lack of any guidance on the reporting of the uncertainty of imputed scores. In this paper,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Scores, Standardized Tests, Simulation
Anderson, Daniel; Farley, Dan; Tindal, Gerald – Journal of Special Education, 2015
Students with significant cognitive disabilities present an assessment dilemma that centers on access and validity in large-scale testing programs. Typically, access is improved by eliminating construct-irrelevant barriers, while validity is improved, in part, through test standardization. In this article, one state's alternate assessment data…
Descriptors: Mental Retardation, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation, Standardized Tests
Mislevy, Robert J.; Haertel, Geneva; Cheng, Britte H.; Ructtinger, Liliana; DeBarger, Angela; Murray, Elizabeth; Rose, David; Gravel, Jenna; Colker, Alexis M.; Rutstein, Daisy; Vendlinski, Terry – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2013
Standardizing aspects of assessments has long been recognized as a tactic to help make evaluations of examinees fair. It reduces variation in irrelevant aspects of testing procedures that could advantage some examinees and disadvantage others. However, recent attention to making assessment accessible to a more diverse population of students…
Descriptors: Testing Accommodations, Access to Education, Testing, Psychometrics
Rivas-Moya, Teresa; Gonzalez-Valenzuela, Maria-Jose – Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2007
In educational practice, for the evaluation and diagnosis of learning disabilities (LD), it is advisable to use standardized tests together with observation questionnaires. When observation questionnaires are used in the study of LD, Cohen's (1960) kappa coefficient (k) is frequently applied as a measure of agreement between two raters when they…
Descriptors: Observation, Learning Disabilities, Standardized Tests, Educational Practices
Briggs, Derek C. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2004
In the social sciences, evaluating the effectiveness of a program or intervention often leads researchers to draw causal inferences from observational research designs. Bias in estimated causal effects becomes an obvious problem in such settings. This article presents the Heckman Model as an approach sometimes applied to observational data for the…
Descriptors: Social Science Research, Statistical Inference, Causal Models, Test Bias
Facione, Peter A. – 1989
Four major problem areas inhibit the standardized assessment of critical thinking (CT): (1) content validity; (2) construct validity; (3) technical jargon; and (4) background knowledge. Practical examples of framing multiple-choice items for assessment are suggested. In the area of content validity, new agreement about the definition of CT now…
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Construct Validity, Content Validity, Critical Thinking