Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 6 |
Evaluation Methods | 6 |
Test Use | 6 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
Test Items | 3 |
Test Construction | 2 |
Test Length | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Assessment Centers (Personnel) | 1 |
Audiotape Recordings | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Eignor, Daniel R. | 1 |
Gu, Lixiong | 1 |
Hutton, Jerry B. | 1 |
Kylie Gorney | 1 |
Ling, Guangming | 1 |
Mark D. Reckase | 1 |
Qu, Yanxuan | 1 |
Reshetar, Rosemary A. | 1 |
Wheeler, Patricia H. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kylie Gorney; Mark D. Reckase – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
In computerized adaptive testing, item exposure control methods are often used to provide a more balanced usage of the item pool. Many of the most popular methods, including the restricted method (Revuelta and Ponsoda), use a single maximum exposure rate to limit the proportion of times that each item is administered. However, Barrada et al.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Banks
Gu, Lixiong; Ling, Guangming; Qu, Yanxuan – ETS Research Report Series, 2019
Research has found that the "a"-stratified item selection strategy (STR) for computerized adaptive tests (CATs) may lead to insufficient use of high a items at later stages of the tests and thus to reduced measurement precision. A refined approach, unequal item selection across strata (USTR), effectively improves test precision over the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Use, Test Items

Eignor, Daniel R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1997
The authors of the "Guidelines," a task force of eight, intend to present an organized list of features to be considered in reporting or evaluating computerized-adaptive assessments. Apart from a few weaknesses, the book is a useful and complete document that will be very helpful to test developers. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines

Hutton, Jerry B.; And Others – School Psychology Review, 1992
A mail survey about the use of instruments in 9 assessment areas was answered by 389 school psychologists. Comparison with a similar survey 10 years earlier suggests no decline in assessment overall, although emphasis is switching away from intelligence testing, toward achievement testing, behavior rating, and adaptive measurements. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Behavior Rating Scales, Comparative Analysis
Reshetar, Rosemary A.; And Others – 1992
This study examined performance of a simulated computerized adaptive test that was designed to help direct the development of a medical recertification examination. The item pool consisted of 229 single-best-answer items from a random sample of 3,000 examinees, calibrated using the two-parameter logistic model. Examinees' responses were known. For…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Classification, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Wheeler, Patricia H. – 1993
A variety of assessment methods and instruments can and should be used to evaluate the performance of individuals and groups. Some possible assessments are described, including (1) adaptive testing; (2) anecdotal records; (3) assessment centers; (4) behavioral checklists; (5) behaviorally anchored rating scales; (6) checklists; (7) computerized…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Audiotape Recordings, Check Lists