NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1244786
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2020
Pages: 7
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0895-7347
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Some Methods and Evaluation for Linking and Equating with Small Samples
Peabody, Michael R.
Applied Measurement in Education, v33 n1 p3-9 2020
The purpose of the current article is to introduce the equating and evaluation methods used in this special issue. Although a comprehensive review of all existing models and methodologies would be impractical given the format, a brief introduction to some of the more popular models will be provided. A brief discussion of the conditions required for equating precedes the discussion of the equating methods themselves. The procedures in this review include the Tucker method, mean equating, nominal weights mean, simplified circle arc, identity equating, and IRT/Rasch model equating. Models shown that help to evaluate the success of the equating process are the standard error of equating, bias, and root-mean-square error. This should provide readers with a basic framework and enough background information to follow the studies found in this issue.
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A