Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 73 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 333 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 658 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1710 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 4241 |
| Student Evaluation | 1492 |
| Testing | 1258 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1061 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 722 |
| Foreign Countries | 720 |
| Educational Testing | 610 |
| Educational Assessment | 601 |
| Test Construction | 537 |
| Testing Problems | 516 |
| Higher Education | 465 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Thurlow, Martha | 29 |
| Thurlow, Martha L. | 22 |
| Tindal, Gerald | 12 |
| Ysseldyke, James E. | 12 |
| Baker, Eva L. | 10 |
| Alonzo, Julie | 9 |
| Herman, Joan L. | 9 |
| Popham, W. James | 8 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 7 |
| Jaeger, Richard M. | 7 |
| Lai, Cheng Fei | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 263 |
| Teachers | 138 |
| Researchers | 100 |
| Administrators | 67 |
| Policymakers | 36 |
| Students | 19 |
| Counselors | 11 |
| Parents | 10 |
| Community | 9 |
| Support Staff | 7 |
| Media Staff | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 85 |
| Australia | 72 |
| Canada | 68 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 44 |
| United States | 44 |
| California | 41 |
| Florida | 40 |
| Germany | 34 |
| Turkey | 31 |
| Netherlands | 29 |
| New York | 27 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 3 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedSenf, Janet H. – Evaluation Review, 1987
Reasons for not returning a questionnaire were studied among Lutheran church members sent a postcard to indicate no intention of replying. The analysis is based on 431 returned postcards. For most nonresponders, the interest value of the questionnaire topic was not high enough. Many who returned the negative reply card would be resistant…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Questionnaires, Response Style (Tests)
Harris, Karen R. – Diagnostique, 1983
Three procedures that help to determine the degree of confidence we can place in any raw score are discussed: computing the standard error of measurement, computing the estimated true score, and constructing confidence intervals. These three procedures are easy to use and require only elementary mathematical skills. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewedStile, Stephen W.; Pettibone, Timothy J. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1983
Undergraduates (N=32) in a special education survey course generally expressed positive reactions to a microcomputer-based testing program. No significant differences were found between the microcomputer-based program and paper-and-pencil varieties. (CL)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Preservice Teacher Education
Peer reviewedHoy, Mary P.; Retish, Paul M. – Exceptional Children, 1984
Data contained in the Learning Potential Assessment Device report were compared with information in a standard psychological report for value in educational programming with 146 graduate special education students. Ss rated both reports negatively. Neither report was perceived to be valuable for program planning purposes. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Program Development, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewedSchneider, Anne L.; Darcy, Robert E. – Evaluation Review, 1984
The normative implications of applying significance tests in evaluation research are examined. The authors conclude that evaluators often make normative decisions, based on the traditional .05 significance level in studies with small samples. Additional reporting of the magnitude of impact, the significance level, and the power of the test is…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology, Research Problems
Peer reviewedUlrich, Walter – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1984
Argues that hypothesis testing is an inadequate paradigm for evaluating academic debates because (1) defenders of hypothesis testing cannot meet the standards they impose on other arguers and (2) hypothesis testing does not achieve its goal of discovering probable truth. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Lazear, Edward P. – National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2005
Educators worry that high-stakes testing will induce teachers and their students to focus only on the test and ignore other, untested aspects of knowledge. Some counter that although this may be true, knowing something is better than knowing nothing and many students would benefit even by learning the material that is to be tested. Using the…
Descriptors: Figurative Language, Testing, High Stakes Tests, Student Evaluation
Yu, Chong-Ho – Online Submission, 2005
Many research-related classes in social sciences present probability as a unified approach based upon mathematical axioms, but neglect the diversity of various probability theories and their associated philosophical assumptions. Although currently the dominant statistical and probabilistic approach is the Fisherian tradition, the use of Fisherian…
Descriptors: Probability, Inferences, Social Sciences, Statistical Significance
Zwick, Rebecca – 1994
The Mantel Haenszel (MH; 1959) approach of Holland and Thayer (1988) is a well-established method for assessing differential item functioning (DIF). The formula for the variance of the MH DIF statistic is based on work by Phillips and Holland (1987) and Robins, Breslow, and Greenland (1986). Recent simulation studies showed that the MH variances…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Evaluation Methods, Item Bias, Measurement Techniques
Schafer, William D. – 2003
Three groups of persons are involved in the testing enterprise: test producers, test users, and test takers. A wide literature is available to guide the first two groups, but only recently have measurement professionals considered the interests of test takers in any careful way. The content of this chapter is presented as a set of 26…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Testing, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines
Conlon, Amy L.; Hansen, Jo-Ida C. – 2003
Assessment tools from the counseling arena can be useful in educational settings for developing effective instructional strategies and learning environments; identifying students who would benefit from referral to a mental health professional; and promoting student's growth and well-being by fostering self-awareness and identity development. In…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Counseling, Educational Environment, Evaluation Methods
Axelson, Mary – AEL, 2004
In June 2004, in conjunction with the Council of Chief State School Officers' (CCSSO) 34th national conference on large-scale assessment, the Institute for the Advancement of Emerging Technologies in Education (IAETE) at AEL hosted a daylong symposium to discuss critical policy issues related to technology-supported assessments. Held in Boston,…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Educational Policy
Peer reviewedTuinman, J. Jaap – Reading Research Quarterly, 1973
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Reading Comprehension, Reading Tests, Test Construction
Peer reviewedPeck, Donald M.; Jencks, Stanley M. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1974
Examples are presented in which students are able to answer test items requiring manipulation of numbers for such topics as reducing fractions, but lack understanding of the operation. In addition to paper-and-pencil test, interviews are recommended for evaluating a student's understanding. (JP)
Descriptors: Diagrams, Elementary School Mathematics, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedBryan, Jonathan R. – English in Education, 1973
Compares the American and British systems of continuous examinations, concluding that the British can benefit most by incorporating elements from each system. (RB)
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, English Instruction, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation


