NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schwandt, Thomas A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
Current discussion of the professionalization of the practice of evaluation is focused on matters of competencies and credentialing and largely overlooks several significant issues. These include conflating professionalizing the practice with promoting the value of evaluation as a social good, assuming there is widespread agreement on what the…
Descriptors: Professionalism, Professional Identity, Ethics, Fidelity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bundi, Pirmin – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
Research on evaluation has mainly focused on the use of evaluation and has given little attention to the origins of evaluation demand. In this article, I consider the question of why parliamentarians demand evaluations with parliamentary requests. Building on the literature of delegation, I use a principal-agent framework to explain the origins of…
Descriptors: Evaluation Needs, Evaluation Research, Accountability, Parliamentary Procedures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McKegg, Kate – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
In a world faced with unprecedented rising levels of inequality and injustice, is there a responsibility for our evaluation organizations to take on a leadership role in promoting inclusive, evaluative dialog and deliberation about the state of our democracies in relation to key democratic principles and ideals? In this forum, I question whether…
Descriptors: Democratic Values, Democracy, Evaluation, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chouinard, Jill Anne – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
In the original paper, it was argued that while there is an array of methods and methodologies available, their use is delimited by the culture of accountability that prevails in public sector institutions, a fact that is particularly problematic given the complexity and diversity of evaluation contexts today. This short rejoinder, to responses…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Public Sector, Evaluation Needs, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weitzman, Beth C.; Silver, Diana – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
In this commentary, we examine Braverman's insights into the trade-offs between feasibility and rigor in evaluation measures and reject his assessment of the trade-off as a zero-sum game. We, argue that feasibility and policy salience are, like reliability and validity, intrinsic to the definition of a good measure. To reduce the tension between…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Measures (Individuals), Evaluation Methods, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grob, George F. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
The author enjoyed reading Katharine Hay's ambitious and humbling visions for evaluation field building in South Asia. She has successfully positioned herself on a high mountain with a wonderful set of binoculars that enable her to see the entire evaluation landscape of South Asia. She magically sees and describes significant historical forces and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Evaluators, Foreign Countries, Accountability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sridharan, Sanjeev; De Silva, Soma – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
The papers in this dialogue help develop evaluation as a field (both in South Asia and other regions). What comes through in all of the papers is both humility of where evaluation is as a field and imagination and ambition of where evaluators could be in the near future. Reading the papers in this forum makes them enthusiastic about being…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Aspiration, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rogers, Susan J.; Ahmed, Marie; Hamdallah, Myriam; Little, Stacey – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
Grantees on national projects are often required by their funders to take part in evaluation activities. While the requirement can encourage compliance, grantees can feel overburdened and disempowered with their evaluation experience. Evaluators in a national cross-site evaluation utilized multiple strategies for obtaining buy-in of participating…
Descriptors: Evaluation Needs, Evaluators, Compliance (Legal), Advisory Committees
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Picciotto, Robert – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
The millennium development goals have created new challenges for development evaluation. The main unit of account has shifted to the country level. Evaluation ownership must move from donor agencies to developing countries. The recognition that rich countries have development obligations is opening up evaluation frontiers beyond aid. A…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Developing Nations, Evaluation Needs, Global Approach