NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 1 to 15 of 823 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tomáš Lintner – npj Science of Learning, 2024
With the opportunities and challenges stemming from the artificial intelligence developments and its integration into society, AI literacy becomes a key concern. Utilizing quality AI literacy instruments is crucial for understanding and promoting AI literacy development. This systematic review assessed the quality of AI literacy scales using the…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Artificial Intelligence, Literacy, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karen B. Schmaling; Gabriel R. Evenson; Blake K. Marble; Stephen A. Gallo – Research Evaluation, 2024
Peer review is integral to the evaluation of grant proposals. Reviewer perceptions and characteristics have received limited study, especially their associations with reviewers' evaluations. This mixed methods study analyzed the unstructured comments of 270 experienced peer reviewers after they scored proposals based on mock overall evaluations…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Grants, Evaluation Research, Program Proposals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julia Espinosa-Fajardo; Pablo Rodríguez-Bilella; Esteban Tapella – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
In the last three decades, the promotion of stakeholder involvement in evaluation has been gaining relevance in the Latin American and internationally, across varied agencies, institutions, and civic organizations. The 2030 Agenda and the Global Evaluation Agenda have also recognized the centrality of participation in evaluation. This article…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Stakeholders, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tony Ross-Hellauer; Noémie Aubert Bonn; Serge P. J. M. Horbach – Research Evaluation, 2024
Debates about appropriate, fair and effective ways of assessing research and researchers have raged through the scientific community for decades, recently mostly concerned with discussing the merits and limitations of metric-based, quantitative assessments versus peer review-based, qualitative alternatives. Ample attention has been paid to formal…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Evaluation Methods, Research Universities, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kristin Gagnier; Laura Holian; Melissa Kurman – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2024
Evaluation designs seek to provide evidence of impact and collect formative data to understand and improve programs and inform decisions. Formative data is commonly used at the onset of developing a new program to modify and improve before full implementation. However, formative data is often collected throughout the life of the program to shape…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Research Design, Formative Evaluation, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Venie Perumalsamy; Juliet Perumal; Parvathy Naidoo; Naiema Taliep – Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 2024
Globally, the appraisal of educators remains a contested issue as the process, which aims to provide support and development to educators, is generally considered a punitive measure for educators. Within the South African context, the Integrated Quality Management System is used to evaluate educators. Drawing on Fraser's theories of social…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Social Justice, Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
A. R. Georgeson – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
There is increasing interest in using factor scores in structural equation models and there have been numerous methodological papers on the topic. Nevertheless, sum scores, which are computed from adding up item responses, continue to be ubiquitous in practice. It is therefore important to compare simulation results involving factor scores to…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Scores, Factor Analysis, Statistical Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mehmet Pinar; Emre Unlu – Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 2024
The Research Excellence Framework (REF) follows a set of submission rules. Here we analyse whether the submission rules of the impact element arguably shaped the submission sizes of the submitting units -- a group of academics researching on a specific subject area in higher education providers -- to the REF in 2014. The number of impact case…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Research, Higher Education, Case Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Worthington, Paisley; Cooper, Amanda; Searle, Michelle J.; Hughes, Jennifer; Gokiert, Rebecca J. – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2023
Evaluation use is a complex, iterative process involving diverse stakeholders and activities. Factors influencing evaluation use has long been discussed, however, little is known about current conceptualizations evaluation use including what counts as use, what encourages use, and how to measure use. Following two previous scoping reviews, we…
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Influences, Barriers, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Woolley, Richard; Molas-Gallart, Jordi – Research Evaluation, 2023
Impact assessment research has developed theory-based approaches to trace the societal impact of scientific research. Impact assessment typically starts from the perspective of a research investment, organization, or project. Research users, non-academic actors involved in knowledge production, translation, and application, are well represented in…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Scientific Research, Research Utilization, Users (Information)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Valeria Santoro Lamelas; Riccardo Valente; Anne-Sophie Gresle – Research Evaluation, 2024
Participatory research can be promoted by scientific intermediary units, such as Science Shops. The overarching goal of these initiatives is thereby to foster a process of co-creation of the research questions to address societal needs that are relevant to scientific research and society at large. The InSPIRES project was a Horizon Europe…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Participatory Research, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sile, Linda; de Rijcke, Sarah – Research Evaluation, 2023
The increasing use of research metrics in the monitoring and evaluation of research has led to the expansion of research information infrastructure, as indicated by the rising number of national databases for research output and research information systems. At the same time, debates on requirements of national databases for research output are…
Descriptors: Databases, Research, Information Systems, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kimberley Serpico – Research Ethics, 2024
The quality of a research study application sends a distinct signal to the institutional review board (IRB) about the skills, capacities, preparation, communication, experience, and resources of its authors. However, efforts to research and define IRB application quality have been insufficient. Inattention to the quality of an IRB application is…
Descriptors: Ethics, Research Methodology, Institutional Evaluation, Governing Boards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ute Knoch; Jason Fan – Language Testing, 2024
While several test concordance tables have been published, the research underpinning such tables has rarely been examined in detail. This study aimed to survey the publically available studies or documentation underpinning the test concordance tables of the providers of four major international language tests, all accepted by the Australian…
Descriptors: Language Tests, English, Test Validity, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Aldis Gedutis; Kestas Kirtiklis – Research Evaluation, 2023
In this article we attempt to reconstruct the tacit and implicit notions of quality in the humanities. This reconstruction is based on a series of semi-structured qualitative interviews with 33 humanities scholars. Applying Max Weber's theory of authority, we argue the quality notions have two different sources--external and internal. External…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Humanities, Scholarship, Expertise
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  55