Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Atkinson, Becky M. | 1 |
Duque, Matthew | 1 |
Groves, Curtis L. | 1 |
McEachin, Andrew J. | 1 |
Polikoff, Morgan S. | 1 |
Stonehill, Robert M. | 1 |
VanderPloeg, Arie J. | 1 |
Wrabel, Stephani L. | 1 |
Yap, Kim Onn | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Hawaii | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 5 |
Education Consolidation… | 1 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Polikoff, Morgan S.; McEachin, Andrew J.; Wrabel, Stephani L.; Duque, Matthew – Educational Researcher, 2014
Forty-two states and the District of Columbia have recently received waivers to the school accountability requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). As the prospects for reauthorizing the Act in the near term are dim, these new accountability systems will be law for at least several years. Drawing on a four-part framework from the…
Descriptors: Accountability, Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Educational Policy
Atkinson, Becky M. – Journal of Teacher Education, 2012
The study reported in this article examines how teachers read and respond to their students' Stanford Achievement Test 10 (SAT 10) scores with the goal of investigating the assumption that data-based teaching practice is more "objective" and less susceptible to divergent teacher interpretation. The study uses reader response theory to…
Descriptors: Reader Response, Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Theories

Stonehill, Robert M.; Groves, Curtis L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
U.S. Department of Education (ED) activities relating to the utility of Title I evaluations are discussed within the context of an overview of the Title I Evaluation and Reporting System (TIERS) and a history of Title I evaluations. Implications for Chapter 1 of the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act (ECIA) of 1981 are considered. (LC)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Collection, Decision Making, Educational Policy

VanderPloeg, Arie J. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
A brief history of Title I evaluation efforts in Chicago illustrates the concern that the evaluation of Title I programs must serve two masters: the federal reporting mandate and local needs. (PN)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Compensatory Education, Educational Legislation, Evaluation Utilization
Yap, Kim Onn – 1983
The study involved an attempt to promote use of evaluation data in compensatory education through a technical assistance effort at the state education agencies (SEA) level. It included a secondary analysis of Hawaiian Title I longitudinal data and dissemination of findings through a series of consultations with evaluation and program personnel at…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Compensatory Education, Data Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education