Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Evaluators | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Citizenship | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Creative Thinking | 1 |
| Creativity Tests | 1 |
| Credits | 1 |
| Cross Cultural Studies | 1 |
| Cultural Context | 1 |
| Disadvantaged | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Israel | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Program for International… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNils Myszkowski; Martin Storme – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
In the PISA 2022 creative thinking test, students provide a response to a prompt, which is then coded by human raters as no credit, partial credit, or full credit. Like many large-scale educational testing frameworks, PISA uses the generalized partial credit model (GPCM) as a response model for these ordinal ratings. In this paper, we show that…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Scores, Prompting
Shohamy, Elana – Language and Intercultural Communication, 2013
While much of the work in language testing is concerned with constructing quality tests in order to measure language knowledge in reliable and valid ways, there has been a significant movement in language testing research that examines tests in the context of their use in education and society. This line of research exits from the notion that…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Testing, Evaluation Research, Ideology
