NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 22 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tucker, Susan; Stevahn, Laurie; King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This article compares the purposes and content of the four foundational documents of the American Evaluation Association (AEA): the Program Evaluation Standards, the AEA Public Statement on Cultural Competence in Evaluation, the AEA Evaluator Competencies, and the AEA Guiding Principles. This reflection on alignment is an early effort in the third…
Descriptors: Professionalism, Comparative Analysis, Professional Associations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alkin, Marvin C.; King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
The second article in this series on the history of evaluation use has three sections. The first and longest develops a functional definition of the term "use," noting that a thorough definition of evaluation use includes the initial stimulus (i.e., evaluation findings or process), the user, the way people use the information, the aspect…
Descriptors: Definitions, Users (Information), Ethics, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
The author is increasingly sensitive to the Venn diagram of overlapping expertise in which program evaluation intersects a content area such as public health, urban education, or--in the case of Katherine Hay--international development. Many evaluators practice in these areas of overlap, experts in the evaluation of a specific domain. Given her…
Descriptors: Organizational Development, Developing Nations, Intellectual Disciplines, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Johnson, Kelli; Greenseid, Lija O.; Toal, Stacie A.; King, Jean A.; Lawrenz, Frances; Volkov, Boris – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
This paper reviews empirical research on the use of evaluation from 1986 to 2005 using Cousins and Leithwood's 1986 framework for categorizing empirical studies of evaluation use conducted since that time. The literature review located 41 empirical studies of evaluation use conducted between 1986 and 2005 that met minimum quality standards. The…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Classification, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
This excerpt from the opening plenary asks evaluators to consider two questions regarding learning and evaluation: (a) How do evaluators know if, how, when, and what people are learning during an evaluation? and (b) In what ways can evaluation be a learning experience? To answer the first question, evaluators can apply the commonplaces of…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Learning Experience, Program Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A.; Ehlert, John C. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2008
This study discusses three evaluations completed in a large suburban school district, each of which involved stakeholders purposefully throughout the inquiry process. The reflective case narrative addresses three questions: (1) To what extent or in which parts of the evaluations were stakeholders involved? (2) What actions did the evaluator(s)…
Descriptors: School Districts, Suburban Schools, Evaluators, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A.; Cousins, J. Bradley; Whitmore, Elizabeth – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
This chapter begins with a commentary by King, a longtime admirer of Cousins and Whitmore, in which she discusses why their 1998 article on participatory evaluation is considered an important contribution to the field. Participatory evaluation was not a new idea in 1998. By the mid-1990s articles, chapters, and books that described evaluations…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Action Research, Participatory Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Toal, Stacie A.; King, Jean A.; Johnson, Kelli; Lawrenz, Frances – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2009
As the number of large federal programs increases, so, too, does the need for a more complete understanding of how to conduct evaluations of such complex programs. The research literature has documented the benefits of stakeholder participation in smaller-scale program evaluations. However, given the scope and diversity of projects in multi-site…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Federal Programs, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
This article discusses how to make process use an independent variable in evaluation practice: the purposeful means of building an organization's capacity to conduct and use evaluations in the long run. The goal of evaluation capacity building (ECB) is to strengthen and sustain effective program evaluation practices through a number of activities:…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Predictor Variables, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
King, Jean A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2003
Discusses why evaluation has a field has not studied its own theory systematically and examines the tensions between the often-cited claim of K. Lewin that there is noting as practical as a good theory and the response of M. Fullan that there is nothing as theoretical as good practice. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Theories, Theory Practice Relationship
Thompson, Bruce; King, Jean A. – 1981
The literature on program evaluation contains numerous suggestions that evaluative information is frequently underutilized or inappropriately utilized by administrators. This paper reviews the literature on utilization with a view toward identifying workable strategies for optimizing appropriate use. Specific recommendations to evaluators include…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Evaluators, Information Utilization, Program Evaluation
King, Jean A.; And Others – 1981
A project for studying ways to optimize utilization of evaluation products in public schools is reported. The results indicate that the negative picture of use prevalent in recent literature stems from the unrealistic expectation that local decision-makers will behave in a classically rational manner. Such a view ignores the political settings of…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation, Evaluators, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alkin, Marvin C.; Christie, Christina A.; Greene, Jennifer C.; Henry, Gary T.; Donaldson, Stewart I.; King, Jean A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
The editors give each of the theorists a chance to respond to questions posed about the context of the situation in relation to their own experience in the field, exploring how the exercise had an impact on their evaluation designs.
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Context Effect, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stevahn, Laurie; King, Jean A.; Ghere, Gail; Minnema, Jane – American Journal of Evaluation, 2005
This article presents a comprehensive taxonomy of essential competencies for program evaluators. First, the authors provide a rationale for developing evaluator competencies, along with a brief history of the initial development and validation of the taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies in King, Stevahn, Ghere, and Minnema (2001). Second,…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Classification, Program Evaluation, Minimum Competencies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ghere, Gail; King, Jean A.; Stevahn, Laurie; Minnema, Jane – American Journal of Evaluation, 2006
This article describes an interactive professional development unit that engages both novice and experienced evaluators in (a) learning about the Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators (ECPE), (b) applying the competencies to program evaluation contexts, and (c) using the ECPE to reflect on their own professional practices. The article…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Professional Development, Program Evaluation, Competence
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2