Publication Date
In 2025 | 35 |
Since 2024 | 108 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Cherie M. Avent | 3 |
Audrey Doyle | 2 |
Ceily L. Moore | 2 |
Denis Dumas | 2 |
John M. LaVelle | 2 |
Rebecca M. Teasdale | 2 |
Scott I. Donaldson | 2 |
Seth B. Hunter | 2 |
Xinru Yan | 2 |
Aaron Zimmerman | 1 |
Adeyemo Adetogun | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 95 |
Reports - Research | 83 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 9 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 8 |
Reports - Descriptive | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 6 |
Information Analyses | 5 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
China | 4 |
Japan | 4 |
Australia | 2 |
Europe | 2 |
Iran | 2 |
Ireland | 2 |
New Zealand | 2 |
Singapore | 2 |
Sweden | 2 |
Texas | 2 |
Thailand | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rebecca M. Teasdale; Cherie M. Avent; Ceily L. Moore; María B. Serrano Abreu; Xinru Yan – American Journal of Evaluation, 2025
Evaluators must attend to the destructive forces of racialization and racism to contribute to social transformation. Thus, evaluators are called to center culture, context, equity, and social justice during each step of the evaluation process. Here, we focus on the step(s) in which evaluators define program quality and specify evaluative lines of…
Descriptors: Racism, Evaluation Criteria, Social Justice, Evaluators
Stefan O'Grady – TESOL Journal, 2025
Task-based language assessment represents a major component of task-based language teaching syllabi. Current perspectives emphasise the importance of tasks in the assessment process, suggesting that adherence to influential models of language production during task design yields predictable test outcomes. The current study contends that the…
Descriptors: Task Analysis, Language Tests, Evaluators, Rating Scales
Bahar Saberzadeh-Ardestani; Ali Reza Sima; Bardia Khosravi; Meredith Young; Sara Mortaz Hejri – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2024
Few studies have engaged in data-driven investigations of the presence, or frequency, of what could be considered retaliatory assessor behaviour in Multi-source Feedback (MSF) systems. In this study, authors explored how assessors scored others if, before assessing others, they received their own assessment score. The authors examined assessments…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Scores, Evaluators, Behavior
Karen B. Schmaling; Gabriel R. Evenson; Blake K. Marble; Stephen A. Gallo – Research Evaluation, 2024
Peer review is integral to the evaluation of grant proposals. Reviewer perceptions and characteristics have received limited study, especially their associations with reviewers' evaluations. This mixed methods study analyzed the unstructured comments of 270 experienced peer reviewers after they scored proposals based on mock overall evaluations…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Grants, Evaluation Research, Program Proposals
Rolf Magnus Grung; Gunn-Astrid Baugerud; Ragnhild Klingenberg Røed; Miriam S. Johnson – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2024
When forensic interviewers reject children's "Don't know" responses, either by repeating questions or pressuring the children to provide different responses, children may change their subsequent responses. The primary objective of the current study was to examine interviewer reactions following preschool-aged alleged abuse victims'…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Responses, Victims of Crime, Child Abuse
Akif Avcu – Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2025
This scope-review presents the milestones of how Hierarchical Rater Models (HRMs) become operable to used in automated essay scoring (AES) to improve instructional evaluation. Although essay evaluations--a useful instrument for evaluating higher-order cognitive abilities--have always depended on human raters, concerns regarding rater bias,…
Descriptors: Automation, Scoring, Models, Educational Assessment
Zebo Xu; Prerit S. Mittal; Mohd. Mohsin Ahmed; Chandranath Adak; Zhenguang G. Cai – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2025
The rise of the digital era has led to a decline in handwriting as the primary mode of communication, resulting in negative effects on handwriting literacy, particularly in complex writing systems such as Chinese. The marginalization of handwriting has contributed to the deterioration of penmanship, defined as the ability to write aesthetically…
Descriptors: Handwriting, Writing Skills, Chinese, Ideography
Huey T. Chen; Liliana Morosanu; Victor H. Chen – Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2024
This article aims to review and comment on the articles in this Special Issue and suggest directions for Singaporean evaluators to consider in the future. Based on the review, we found education evaluators in Singapore are familiar with up-to-date evaluation theories and approaches and successfully apply them. We also found that a substantial…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Evaluators, Educational Research, Futures (of Society)
Paul Benneworth; Julia Olmos-Peñuela – Research Evaluation, 2024
Over the last decade, the idea of societal impact resulting from publicly funded research has changed from being a relatively fringe concern related to high-technology entrepreneurship and spin-off companies to becoming an increasingly important public policy concern. This has stimulated academic science policy research to investigate the impact…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Program Evaluation, Program Effectiveness, Research Projects
Tony Ross-Hellauer; Noémie Aubert Bonn; Serge P. J. M. Horbach – Research Evaluation, 2024
Debates about appropriate, fair and effective ways of assessing research and researchers have raged through the scientific community for decades, recently mostly concerned with discussing the merits and limitations of metric-based, quantitative assessments versus peer review-based, qualitative alternatives. Ample attention has been paid to formal…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Evaluation Methods, Research Universities, Evaluation Criteria
Onyinyechukwu Onu Onwuka du Bruyn – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Historically, the field of program evaluation has been dominated by middle class White practitioners often lacking diversity in race, gender, and cultural perspectives (Fitzpatrick, Sanders, & Worthen, 2014). Recent years, however, have seen a concerted effort to promote diversity among evaluators. According to Hopson and Rodriguez (2014),…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Blacks, African Americans, Females
Mike Osiemo Mwirigi – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
This study aimed to develop and validate the Evaluator Competencies Assessment Tool (ECAT) Cultural Competencies Subscale, which measures cultural competence among evaluators. By addressing the scarcity of validated tools in this area, the study offers professionals a valuable resource to assess their strengths and areas for improvement. The…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Competence, Measures (Individuals), Validity
Cherie M. Avent; Rebecca M. Teasdale; Xinru Yan; María B. Serrano-Abreu; Ceily L. Moore – American Journal of Evaluation, 2025
The effects of race can manifest in various ways in evaluation contexts, making it critical for evaluators to unpack how race and racism are "complex and destructive forces" for racially minoritized and Indigenous communities. The clarion calls by evaluators on the need for greater attention to issues of race and racism in evaluation…
Descriptors: Race, Racism, Evaluators, Equal Education
Jessica Renger; Stewart I. Donaldson – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
Anxiety is a multifaceted force that can negatively impact the ability of evaluators to succeed in practice. In the evaluation literature, discussions concerning anxiety have primarily been limited to strategies to reduce stakeholder anxiety to encourage positive and productive working relationships with evaluators. This study was among the first…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Universities, Evaluators, Organizations (Groups)
Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen; Vegard Moen; Jon Tømmerås Selvik – Discover Education, 2024
All students at Norwegian universities and colleges have the right to complain about ordinary grading decisions. When an appeal is made, two new examiners are appointed, at least one of whom should be external. The handling of appeals in the current system is to be blind, meaning that the examiners handling the complaint should not be aware of the…
Descriptors: Grading, Decision Making, College Students, Evaluators