Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 6 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 19 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 55 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 258 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Plake, Barbara S. | 7 |
Jaeger, Richard M. | 5 |
Morris, Michael | 5 |
King, Jean A. | 4 |
Linacre, John M. | 4 |
Altschuld, James W. | 3 |
Cauble, Mary | 3 |
Elder, Catherine | 3 |
Fede, Honore | 3 |
Fitzpatrick, Jody L. | 3 |
Gentry, Jim | 3 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
United Kingdom | 13 |
Australia | 11 |
Canada | 11 |
California | 8 |
United States | 8 |
United Kingdom (England) | 7 |
Louisiana | 6 |
Netherlands | 6 |
Germany | 5 |
South Africa | 5 |
Florida | 4 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Race to the Top | 3 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Family Educational Rights and… | 1 |
Government Performance and… | 1 |
Stewart B McKinney Homeless… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen; Vegard Moen; Jon Tømmerås Selvik – Discover Education, 2024
All students at Norwegian universities and colleges have the right to complain about ordinary grading decisions. When an appeal is made, two new examiners are appointed, at least one of whom should be external. The handling of appeals in the current system is to be blind, meaning that the examiners handling the complaint should not be aware of the…
Descriptors: Grading, Decision Making, College Students, Evaluators
Boni, Alejandra; Velasco, Diana; Molas-Gallart, Jordi; Schot, Johan – Research Evaluation, 2023
This article presents the insights from an evaluation of a transformative policy experiment, in the food domain, conducted at the Swedish Agency of Innovation (Vinnova). To be consistent with the principles and objectives of these policies, it was necessary to implement a formative evaluation approach developed in the Transformative Innovation…
Descriptors: Public Policy, Change, Food, Innovation
Robert H. Eaglen; Steven J. Durning; Holly S. Meyer; Christopher S. Candler – Quality in Higher Education, 2024
Higher education accreditation has spread internationally as a vehicle for quality assurance and improvement but is strongly influenced by accreditation practices in the United States. The organisational structure and processes of seven United States health professions accreditors were analysed to identify common characteristics that reflect…
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Quality Assurance, Evaluators, Evaluation Methods
Acker, Sandra; Rekola, Mika; Wisker, Gina – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2022
Editors of academic journals play a key part in the production of knowledge and the continuation of scholarly conversations about practical and intellectual issues of the day. While peer review, an essential part of journal processes, has received considerable attention in the scholarly and the popular press, much of it critical, the role of the…
Descriptors: Editing, Periodicals, Educational Research, Higher Education
Hall, Jori N. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
Social justice evaluation approaches advance antioppressive and culturally responsive methods to mitigate societal inequalities. However, social justice efforts will fall short if they focus solely on one side of inequality: oppression. Accordingly, this article argues that the other side of inequality--privilege--needs to be scrutinized. This…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Advantaged, Theories, Social Justice
Yuan Tian; Xi Yang; Suhail A. Doi; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Lifeng Lin; Joey S. W. Kwong; Chang Xu – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
RobotReviewer is a tool for automatically assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials, but there is limited evidence of its reliability. We evaluated the agreement between RobotReviewer and humans regarding the risk of bias assessment based on 1955 randomized controlled trials. The risk of bias in these trials was assessed via two…
Descriptors: Risk, Randomized Controlled Trials, Classification, Robotics
Prendergast, Caroline O.; Baker, Gianina; Henning, Gavin; Kahn, Susan; McConnell, Kate; Stitt-Bergh, Monica; Townsend, Linda – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2022
Assessment practitioners in higher education follow a variety of paths to their roles. Diverse preparation supports creative problem-solving in a changing educational landscape. However, it can also lead to inconsistency in language, preparation, and background knowledge. Further, the chasms between assessment practitioners' paths can lead to…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disciplines, Professional Identity, Higher Education, Role
Pann, James M.; DiLuzio, Elizabeth; Coghlan, Anne T.; Hughes, Scott D. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This article explores the utility of mindfulness in the field of evaluation. Mindfulness is a translation of the ancient Indian word, "Sati," which means awareness, attention, and remembering. While definitions vary, a practical definition of mindfulness is present-moment awareness in an open and nonjudgmental manner. Mindfulness-based…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Educational Practices, Metacognition, Evaluators
Ensuring Comparability of Qualifications through Moderation: Implications for Australia's VET Sector
Gillis, Shelley – Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 2023
Maintaining the quality and comparability of qualifications has become a major priority for vocational education and training (VET) systems world-wide, especially for those countries which have decentralised assessment and reporting systems. In the absence of external examinations, one policy solution to align the assessment standards of different…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Vocational Education, Qualifications, Quality Control
Alexander Rushforth; Sarah De Rijcke – Research Evaluation, 2024
Recent times have seen the growth in the number and scope of interacting professional reform movements in science, centered on themes such as open research, research integrity, responsible research assessment, and responsible metrics. The responsible metrics movement identifies the growing influence of quantitative performance indicators as a…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Teacher Selection, Faculty Promotion, Tenure
Kelly, Kate Tremain; Richardson, Mary; Isaacs, Talia – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2022
Comparative judgment is gaining popularity as an assessment tool, including for high-stakes testing purposes, despite relatively little research on the use of the technique. Advocates claim two main rationales for its use: that comparative judgment is valid because humans are better at comparative than absolute judgment, and because it distils the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Evaluative Thinking, High Stakes Tests
Doewes, Afrizal; Kurdhi, Nughthoh Arfawi; Saxena, Akrati – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2023
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) tools aim to improve the efficiency and consistency of essay scoring by using machine learning algorithms. In the existing research work on this topic, most researchers agree that human-automated score agreement remains the benchmark for assessing the accuracy of machine-generated scores. To measure the performance of…
Descriptors: Essays, Writing Evaluation, Evaluators, Accuracy
Gesele E. Durham; Sheena G. Serslev; Matthew DeSantis – Assessment Update, 2024
The George Mason University (Mason) offices responsible for institutional reporting and assessment were merged to strengthen and solidify their functions and expertise. The organizational structure creating the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Planning (OIEP) was intended to engineer a new paradigm where assessment would inform the…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Educational Change, Evaluation Methods, College Outcomes Assessment
Glenn Toh – Policy Futures in Education, 2024
As part of my work as an educator, I see the need to surface for discussion what might indeed be considered as acts of oppression on the part of peer reviewers when certain aspects of knowing and meaning are misrecognized, obscured, or suppressed. Drawing on observations concerning coercive and oppressive relational and educational practices found…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Evaluators, Power Structure, Ideology
Biegelbauer, Peter; Palfinger, Thomas; Mayer, Sabine – Research Evaluation, 2020
Innovation agencies, that is organizations with the primary focus of funding applied research and technological development, evaluate project proposals to select the most promising proposals for funding. At the moment, there is only little verified knowledge available on project evaluation and selection processes of innovation agencies. We want to…
Descriptors: Innovation, Program Proposals, Selection Criteria, Evaluators