NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 191 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mike Osiemo Mwirigi – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
This study aimed to develop and validate the Evaluator Competencies Assessment Tool (ECAT) Cultural Competencies Subscale, which measures cultural competence among evaluators. By addressing the scarcity of validated tools in this area, the study offers professionals a valuable resource to assess their strengths and areas for improvement. The…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Competence, Measures (Individuals), Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jessica Renger; Stewart I. Donaldson – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
Anxiety is a multifaceted force that can negatively impact the ability of evaluators to succeed in practice. In the evaluation literature, discussions concerning anxiety have primarily been limited to strategies to reduce stakeholder anxiety to encourage positive and productive working relationships with evaluators. This study was among the first…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Universities, Evaluators, Organizations (Groups)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cherie M. Avent; Aileen Reid; J. R. Moller; Adeyemo Adetogun; Brianna Hooks Singletary; Ayesha S. Boyce – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
The field of evaluation has experienced greater professionalization in the areas of evaluator education and training. Growth in these areas included sensitivity to issues of diversity, with efforts to attract and retain evaluators of color. Currently, there is limited scholarship on navigating a world with more opportunity but still dealing with…
Descriptors: African Americans, Evaluators, Critical Race Theory, Political Issues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Feinstein, Osvaldo – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
"Integrative evaluation" is an approach with two main phases: identification of plausible rival hypotheses and integration of rival hypotheses. The first phase may correspond to traditional adversary evaluation, whereas the second phase, that is not included in adversary evaluation, requires integrative thinking which can be applied when…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Integrated Activities, Intervention, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
John M. LaVelle; Natalie D. Jones; Scott I. Donaldson – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
The impostor phenomenon is a psychological construct referring to a range of negative emotions associated with a person's perception of their own "fraudulent competence" in a field or of their lack of skills necessary to be successful in that field. Anecdotal evidence suggests that many practicing evaluators have experienced impostor…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Self Efficacy, Competence, Negative Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Da Fonte, M. Alexandra; Wolfe, Nicole P.; DeLuca, Emily R.; Cavagnini, Melissa J.; Nardi, Krista L. – Journal of Special Education Technology, 2023
Mobile technologies, including apps, have become increasingly popular, and are being used to support daily activities among a variety of individuals. While the use of mobile technologies will not eliminate barriers often faced by individuals with disabilities, these systems have the potential to help minimize some of these barriers. As the…
Descriptors: Handheld Devices, Computer Oriented Programs, Evaluation, Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Carniel, Jessica; Hickey, Andrew; Southey, Kim; Brömdal, Annette; Crowley-Cyr, Lynda; Eacersall, Douglas; Farmer, Will; Gehrmann, Richard; Machin, Tanya; Pillay, Yosheen – Research Ethics, 2023
Ethics review processes are frequently perceived as extending from codes and protocols rooted in biomedical disciplines. As a result, many researchers in the humanities and social sciences (HASS) find these processes to be misaligned, if not outrightly obstructive to their research. This leads some scholars to advocate against HASS participation…
Descriptors: Ethics, Humanities, Social Sciences, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Westine, Carl; Li, Zhi – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2021
Intentional synthesis of research findings is necessary to inform practice, particularly within the research on evaluation (RoE) literature. This study expands upon the work of Coryn et al. (2017) to synthesize the RoE studies pertaining to the domain of evaluation context. Findings from this study demonstrate that organization and program's size,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Institutional Characteristics, Evaluation, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pann, James M.; DiLuzio, Elizabeth; Coghlan, Anne T.; Hughes, Scott D. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This article explores the utility of mindfulness in the field of evaluation. Mindfulness is a translation of the ancient Indian word, "Sati," which means awareness, attention, and remembering. While definitions vary, a practical definition of mindfulness is present-moment awareness in an open and nonjudgmental manner. Mindfulness-based…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Educational Practices, Metacognition, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wanzer, Dana Linnell – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
With a lack of consensus of what evaluation is within the field of evaluation, there is a difficulty in communicating to nonevaluators what evaluation is and how evaluation differs from research. To understand how evaluation is defined, both evaluators and researchers were asked how they defined evaluation and, if at all, differentiated evaluation…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Research, Differences, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Teasdale, Rebecca M.; McNeilly, Jennifer R.; Garzón, Maria Isabel Ramírez; Novak, Judit; Greene, Jennifer C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This study challenges persistent misrepresentations of evaluation as a value-neutral inquiry process by presenting an empirical study that deepens understanding of evaluators' values and how they "show up" in evaluation practice. Through semistructured interviews and inductive analysis, we examined the values advanced by a sample of…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Values, Evaluation, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
LaVelle, John M.; Donaldson, Stewart I. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
The profession of evaluation continues to grow, generating more demand for evaluation services than can be fulfilled by the supply of well-trained evaluation practitioners. In this brief forum article, we discuss the current state of evaluator education in the United States and the ways in which university-based programs support the development of…
Descriptors: Universities, Evaluation, Evaluators, Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boyce, Ayesha S.; Reid, Aileen; Avent, Cherie; Adetogun, Adeyemo; Moller, J.R.; Singletary, Brianna Hooks – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
Violence, marginalization, oppression, exploitation, erasure, and injustice are cornerstones of the Black experience in the United States. Despite seemingly insurmountable challenges, Black people have worked diligently and competently to earn spaces within the present-day professional arena. While the experiences of Black professionals have been…
Descriptors: Social Justice, African Americans, Evaluators, Self Concept
Marcia Joppert – ProQuest LLC, 2023
The world has experienced rapid changes, leading to pressing issues such as environmental degradation, social inequality, and resource depletion. As a transdisciplinary field, evaluation has emerged as a crucial tool in addressing these challenges and promoting systemic change. However, concerns have been raised regarding the field's capacity to…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Systems Approach, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kettil Nordesjö – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
The relationship between "stability" and "change" is a central paradox of administration that pervades all forms of organizing. Evaluation is not unfamiliar with paradoxical objectives and roles, which can result in tensions for evaluators and stakeholders. In this article, paradoxes between stability and change in the…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Philosophy, Evaluation, Social Capital
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13