NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 237 results Save | Export
Akif Avcu – Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2025
This scope-review presents the milestones of how Hierarchical Rater Models (HRMs) become operable to used in automated essay scoring (AES) to improve instructional evaluation. Although essay evaluations--a useful instrument for evaluating higher-order cognitive abilities--have always depended on human raters, concerns regarding rater bias,…
Descriptors: Automation, Scoring, Models, Educational Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boris Forthmann; Benjamin Goecke; Roger E. Beaty – Creativity Research Journal, 2025
Human ratings are ubiquitous in creativity research. Yet, the process of rating responses to creativity tasks -- typically several hundred or thousands of responses, per rater -- is often time-consuming and expensive. Planned missing data designs, where raters only rate a subset of the total number of responses, have been recently proposed as one…
Descriptors: Creativity, Research, Researchers, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tong Wu; Stella Y. Kim; Carl Westine; Michelle Boyer – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
While significant attention has been given to test equating to ensure score comparability, limited research has explored equating methods for rater-mediated assessments, where human raters inherently introduce error. If not properly addressed, these errors can undermine score interchangeability and test validity. This study proposes an equating…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Evaluators, Error of Measurement, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Jue; Engelhard, George; Combs, Trenton – Journal of Experimental Education, 2023
Unfolding models are frequently used to develop scales for measuring attitudes. Recently, unfolding models have been applied to examine rater severity and accuracy within the context of rater-mediated assessments. One of the problems in applying unfolding models to rater-mediated assessments is that the substantive interpretations of the latent…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Scoring, Accuracy, Computational Linguistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Song, Yoon Ah; Lee, Won-Chan – Applied Measurement in Education, 2022
This article presents the performance of item response theory (IRT) models when double ratings are used as item scores over single ratings when rater effects are present. Study 1 examined the influence of the number of ratings on the accuracy of proficiency estimation in the generalized partial credit model (GPCM). Study 2 compared the accuracy of…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Item Analysis, Scores, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Doewes, Afrizal; Kurdhi, Nughthoh Arfawi; Saxena, Akrati – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2023
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) tools aim to improve the efficiency and consistency of essay scoring by using machine learning algorithms. In the existing research work on this topic, most researchers agree that human-automated score agreement remains the benchmark for assessing the accuracy of machine-generated scores. To measure the performance of…
Descriptors: Essays, Writing Evaluation, Evaluators, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nakayama, Minoru; Sciarrone, Filippo; Temperini, Marco; Uto, Masaki – International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 2022
Massive open on-line courses (MOOCs) are effective and flexible resources to educate, train, and empower populations. Peer assessment (PA) provides a powerful pedagogical strategy to support educational activities and foster learners' success, also where a huge number of learners is involved. Item response theory (IRT) can model students'…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Peer Evaluation, MOOCs, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Denis Dumas; James C. Kaufman – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Who should evaluate the originality and task-appropriateness of a given idea has been a perennial debate among psychologists of creativity. Here, we argue that the most relevant evaluator of a given idea depends crucially on the level of expertise of the person who generated it. To build this argument, we draw on two complimentary theoretical…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Creativity, Task Analysis, Psychologists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Jue; Engelhard, George, Jr. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2019
The purpose of this study is to explore the use of unfolding models for evaluating the quality of ratings obtained in rater-mediated assessments. Two different judgmental processes can be used to conceptualize ratings: impersonal judgments and personal preferences. Impersonal judgments are typically expected in rater-mediated assessments, and…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Preferences, Evaluators, Models
Renato Britto Ferreira – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Modern-day educators often share a sense they lack voice and agency with school administration. A classic example is curriculum development, where third-party designers develop uncontextualized curricula, and teachers then must implement the design even if inefficient and ineffective. What happens if this identical situation occurs at the program…
Descriptors: Art Education, School Administration, Curriculum Design, Program Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wind, Stefanie A.; Sebok-Syer, Stefanie S. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2019
When practitioners use modern measurement models to evaluate rating quality, they commonly examine rater fit statistics that summarize how well each rater's ratings fit the expectations of the measurement model. Essentially, this approach involves examining the unexpected ratings that each misfitting rater assigned (i.e., carrying out analyses of…
Descriptors: Measurement, Models, Evaluators, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Zhang, Mengxue; Heffernan, Neil; Lan, Andrew – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2023
Automated scoring of student responses to open-ended questions, including short-answer questions, has great potential to scale to a large number of responses. Recent approaches for automated scoring rely on supervised learning, i.e., training classifiers or fine-tuning language models on a small number of responses with human-provided score…
Descriptors: Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Mathematics Instruction, Mathematics Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hung, Su-Pin; Huang, Hung-Yu – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2022
To address response style or bias in rating scales, forced-choice items are often used to request that respondents rank their attitudes or preferences among a limited set of options. The rating scales used by raters to render judgments on ratees' performance also contribute to rater bias or errors; consequently, forced-choice items have recently…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Rating Scales, Item Analysis, Preferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zamir, Sara – Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 2019
Purpose: As the school evaluator's role is multifaceted and the school elevator is the school principal's subordinate, this paper aims to present the school evaluator's complex conduct to achieve a better understanding of his or her functioning. Design/methodology/approach: Theoretical paper. Findings: The two critical dimensions connected to the…
Descriptors: Institutional Evaluation, Accountability, Schools, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sunahase, Takeru; Baba, Yukino; Kashima, Hisashi – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2019
Peer assessment is a promising solution for scaling up the grading of a large number of submissions. The reliability of evaluations is one of the critical issues in peer assessment; several probabilistic models have been proposed for obtaining reliable grades from peers. Peer correction is a similar framework, in which students are instructed to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Error Correction, Grading, Reliability
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  16