NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Race to the Top2
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 105 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Torres-Cuello, Maria Alejandra; Pinzon-Salcedo, Luis Arturo – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
Power has always been an element of the program evaluation field, however, it has traditionally been attributed a negative connotation. With that in mind, power is seen as a force possessed to some extent by different stakeholders that can be imposed over others, and by which certain views, ideas, and decisions can be adopted. Given that program…
Descriptors: Power Structure, Program Evaluation, Cooperation, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Feinstein, Osvaldo – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
"Integrative evaluation" is an approach with two main phases: identification of plausible rival hypotheses and integration of rival hypotheses. The first phase may correspond to traditional adversary evaluation, whereas the second phase, that is not included in adversary evaluation, requires integrative thinking which can be applied when…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Integrated Activities, Intervention, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Michelle Searle; Amanda Cooper; Paisley Worthington; Jennifer Hughes; Rebecca Gokiert; Cheryl Poth – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
Factors influencing evaluation use has been a primary concern for evaluators. However, little is known about the current conceptualizations of evaluation use including what counts as use, what efforts encourage use, and how to measure use. This article identifies enablers and constraints to evaluation use based on a scoping review of literature…
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Evaluation Methods, Resources, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harris, Kevin; Oatley, Chad; Mumford, Steven; Pham, Phung K.; Nunns, Heather – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
This method note presents Q methodology as a useful tool for evaluators to add to their practice toolbox. Q methodology, which involves both quantitative and qualitative techniques, can help researchers and evaluators systematically understand subjectivity and the communicability of opinions and perspectives. We first provide an overview of Q…
Descriptors: Q Methodology, Program Evaluation, Foreign Countries, Stakeholders
Megan E. Kauffmann – ProQuest LLC, 2022
The purpose of this study was to explore how evaluators justify using story-based methodologies when examining causality. The two primary research questions of the study included: 1) what arguments are made by evaluators to justify the credibility of story-based causal methodologies to evaluation stakeholders; and 2) from the perspective of…
Descriptors: Credibility, Evaluators, Stakeholders, Story Telling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Teasdale, Rebecca M.; McNeilly, Jennifer R.; Garzón, Maria Isabel Ramírez; Novak, Judit; Greene, Jennifer C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This study challenges persistent misrepresentations of evaluation as a value-neutral inquiry process by presenting an empirical study that deepens understanding of evaluators' values and how they "show up" in evaluation practice. Through semistructured interviews and inductive analysis, we examined the values advanced by a sample of…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Values, Evaluation, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Travis R. Moore; Luke Carmichael Valmadrid; Robyn Baragwanath; Nathaniel Haack; Lori Bakken – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
The ethical guidelines for the American Evaluation Association and the principles of community-based participatory evaluation both state the importance of equitable stakeholder involvement. Regardless of the evaluation approach, however, evaluators are often confronted with gatekeepers, or those who control the access to stakeholders, information,…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Evaluators, Ethics, Community Involvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harnar, Michael A.; Hillman, Jeffrey A.; Endres, Cheryl L.; Snow, Juna Z. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
The term "meta-evaluation"--referring to the "evaluation of evaluations"--has been in the evaluation lexicon for a half-century. Despite this longevity, research on meta-evaluation is sparse and even more so for internal formative types of meta-evaluation. This exploratory study builds on our understanding of meta-evaluative…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Evaluation Research, Quality Assurance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anderson, Emily E.; Hurley, Elisa A.; Serpico, Kimberley; Johnson, Ann; Rowe, Jessica; Singleton, Megan; Bierer, Barbara E.; Cholka, Brooke; Chaudhari, Swapnali; Fernandez Lynch, Holly – Research Ethics, 2023
The primary purpose of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) is to protect the rights and welfare of human research participants. Evaluation and measurement of how IRBs satisfy this purpose and other important goals are open questions that demand empirical research. Research on IRBs, and the Human Research Protection Programs (HRPPs) of which they…
Descriptors: Research, Ethics, Stakeholders, Barriers
Walland, Emma – Research Matters, 2022
In this article, I report on examiners' views and experiences of using Pairwise Comparative Judgement (PCJ) and Rank Ordering (RO) as alternatives to traditional analytical marking for GCSE English Language essays. Fifteen GCSE English Language examiners took part in the study. After each had judged 100 pairs of essays using PCJ and eight packs of…
Descriptors: Essays, Grading, Writing Evaluation, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ginsberg, Alice E. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
This article presents a new tool called Critical Evaluation Capital (CEC) designed to address issues of equity and social justice in program evaluation. CEC is grounded in the tenants of critical race theory and inspired by Yosso's work on community cultural wealth which raises critical issues of positionality and access. CEC is a system for…
Descriptors: Critical Race Theory, Social Justice, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Villence Buchanan – ProQuest LLC, 2021
Educators and community members in the Cayman Islands are subjected to school inspections that are based on the United Kingdom model for inspecting schools. This model has not been tested to determine its appropriateness for use in a Caribbean education setting. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of educators and community…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Inspection, Schools, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Perveen, Uzma; Idris, Muhammad; Zaman, Amir – Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2021
In Pakistan, an accreditation system has been introduced to accredit teacher education programs and initiatives are being taken to begin the registration, licensing, and certification process of teachers. The Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan has declared the accreditation of teacher education programs mandatory. All the institutions…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Accreditation (Institutions), Educational Improvement, Teacher Education Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Nielsen, Sarah R.; Lavigne, Alyson L. – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2020
The growing recognition of "how much" principals matter for student learning and "how" they make a difference has fueled the need to ensure that effective principals are leading every school. One way to achieve this is through principal evaluation, which has experienced significant changes in the last decade. We conducted a…
Descriptors: Principals, Administrator Evaluation, State Regulation, State Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wanzer, Dana Linnell; Berry, Tiffany Dawn – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2020
Research-practice partnerships have become increasingly popular for promoting evidence use, and this is similar to how evaluators partner with practitioners. Researchers and evaluators working in partnership with practitioners participated in a survey measuring evidence use, research rigor and relevance, and interpersonal factors (e.g.,…
Descriptors: Researchers, Evaluators, Educational Research, Evidence Based Practice
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7