Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Doctoral Dissertations | 3 |
Examiners | 3 |
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Supervisors | 2 |
Academic Discourse | 1 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
Conflict of Interest | 1 |
Doctoral Programs | 1 |
Educational Finance | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Kiley, Margaret | 3 |
Mullins, Gerry | 1 |
Wisker, Gina | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 3 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wisker, Gina; Kiley, Margaret – International Journal for Academic Development, 2014
Most research into research supervision practice focuses on functional, collegial or problematic power-related experiences. Work developing the supervisory role concentrates on new supervisors, and on taught development and support programmes. Most literature on academics' professional learning concentrates on learning to be a university teacher…
Descriptors: Doctoral Programs, Supervision, Supervisory Training, Supervisory Methods
Kiley, Margaret – Studies in Higher Education, 2009
The use of external examiners in the doctoral assessment process is seen as a quality assurance process in most higher education systems. This article suggests that the selection of examiners is a critical aspect of that process. Interview analysis highlights the professional/academic considerations involved in selecting suitable examiners, as…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Doctoral Dissertations, Supervisors, Selection

Mullins, Gerry; Kiley, Margaret – Studies in Higher Education, 2002
Interviewed experienced Australian graduate school examiners. Found clear trends with regard to criteria used; critical judgment points in the examination process; perceptions of their own role in the process; and the influence on examiners of previously published work, the views of the other examiners, and the level of perceived responsibility…
Descriptors: Doctoral Dissertations, Evaluation Criteria, Examiners, Foreign Countries