Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Expertise | 6 |
Misconceptions | 6 |
Novices | 6 |
Scientific Concepts | 3 |
Prior Learning | 2 |
Problem Solving | 2 |
Science Instruction | 2 |
Teaching Methods | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Active Learning | 1 |
Adjustment (to Environment) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Chemical Education | 1 |
Journal of Nutrition… | 1 |
Learning and Instruction | 1 |
Mathematics Teaching Research… | 1 |
Mind, Brain, and Education | 1 |
Physical Review Special… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Illinois | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hosseinali Gholami – Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 2025
Scoring mathematics exam papers accurately is vital for fostering students' engagement and interest in the subject. Incorrect scoring practices can erode motivation and lead to the development of false self-confidence. Therefore, the implementation of appropriate scoring methods is essential for the success of mathematics education. This study…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Mathematics Teachers, Scoring, Mathematics Tests
W. Russ Algar; Noureddine Elouazizi; Jaclyn J. Stewart; E. Jane Maxwell; Tanya Tan; Zuxing Zhang; Robin Stoodley; José R. Rodríguez Núñez; Andrea S. Terpstra; Jason G. Wickenden – Journal of Chemical Education, 2022
To develop expertise, novice chemistry students require deliberate practice with immediate and thoughtful feedback. Whereas opportunities for practice are often abundant, opportunities for feedback tend to be much scarcer. To address this challenge, we collaborated with students to develop a flexible and scalable online platform called…
Descriptors: Active Learning, Individualized Instruction, Chemistry, Educational Technology
Masson, Steve; Potvin, Patrice; Riopel, Martin; Foisy, Lorie-Marlène Brault – Mind, Brain, and Education, 2014
Science education studies have revealed that students often have misconceptions about how nature works, but what happens to misconceptions after a conceptual change remains poorly understood. Are misconceptions rejected and replaced by scientific conceptions, or are they still present in students' minds, coexisting with newly acquired…
Descriptors: Brain Hemisphere Functions, Expertise, Misconceptions, Scientific Concepts
Fakcharoenphol, Witat; Morphew, Jason W.; Mestre, José P. – Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2015
Students' ability to effectively study for an exam, or to manage their time during an exam, is related to their metacognitive capacity. Prior research has demonstrated the effective use of metacognitive strategies during learning and retrieval is related to content expertise. Students also make judgments of their own learning and of problem…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Physics, Expertise, Novices
Hinze, Scott R.; Rapp, David N.; Williamson, Vickie M.; Shultz, Mary Jane; Deslongchamps, Ghislain; Williamson, Kenneth C. – Learning and Instruction, 2013
Students are frequently presented with novel visualizations introducing scientific concepts and processes normally unobservable to the naked eye. Despite being unfamiliar, students are expected to understand and employ the visualizations to solve problems. Domain experts exhibit more competency than novices when using complex visualizations, but…
Descriptors: Prior Learning, Individual Differences, Novices, Organic Chemistry
Walters, Amber; Long, Marilee – Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2012
Objective: To determine whether differences in nutrition knowledge affected how women (a high-involvement group) interpreted intrinsic cues (ingredient list) and extrinsic cues ("all natural" label) on food labels. Methods: A 2 (intrinsic cue) x 2 (extrinsic cue) x 2 (nutrition knowledge expert vs novice) within-subject factorial design…
Descriptors: Expertise, Cues, Nutrition, Inferences