NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pere J. Ferrando; Ana Hernández-Dorado; Urbano Lorenzo-Seva – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A frequent criticism of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is that it does not allow correlated residuals to be modelled, while they can be routinely specified in the confirmatory (CFA) model. In this article, we propose an EFA approach in which both the common factor solution and the residual matrix are unrestricted (i.e., the correlated residuals…
Descriptors: Correlation, Factor Analysis, Models, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang-Wallentin, Fan; Joreskog, Karl G.; Luo, Hao – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Ordinal variables are common in many empirical investigations in the social and behavioral sciences. Researchers often apply the maximum likelihood method to fit structural equation models to ordinal data. This assumes that the observed measures have normal distributions, which is not the case when the variables are ordinal. A better approach is…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Forero, Carlos G.; Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto; Gallardo-Pujol, David – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
Factor analysis models with ordinal indicators are often estimated using a 3-stage procedure where the last stage involves obtaining parameter estimates by least squares from the sample polychoric correlations. A simulation study involving 324 conditions (1,000 replications per condition) was performed to compare the performance of diagonally…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Models, Least Squares Statistics, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beauducel, Andre; Herzberg, Philipp Yorck – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2006
This simulation study compared maximum likelihood (ML) estimation with weighted least squares means and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimation. The study was based on confirmatory factor analyses with 1, 2, 4, and 8 factors, based on 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 cases, and on 5, 10, 20, and 40 variables with 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 categories. There was no…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Classification, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ximenez, Carmen – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2006
The recovery of weak factors has been extensively studied in the context of exploratory factor analysis. This article presents the results of a Monte Carlo simulation study of recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of estimation method (maximum likelihood vs. unweighted least squares), sample size,…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Factor Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Sample Size