Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Factor Analysis | 11 |
Least Squares Statistics | 11 |
Simulation | 11 |
Computation | 7 |
Goodness of Fit | 5 |
Item Response Theory | 5 |
Models | 5 |
Error of Measurement | 4 |
Evaluation Methods | 4 |
Sample Size | 4 |
Correlation | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 3 |
Psychological Methods | 2 |
Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Journal of Educational and… | 1 |
Multivariate Behavioral… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 9 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pere J. Ferrando; Ana Hernández-Dorado; Urbano Lorenzo-Seva – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A frequent criticism of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is that it does not allow correlated residuals to be modelled, while they can be routinely specified in the confirmatory (CFA) model. In this article, we propose an EFA approach in which both the common factor solution and the residual matrix are unrestricted (i.e., the correlated residuals…
Descriptors: Correlation, Factor Analysis, Models, Goodness of Fit
Kogar, Hakan – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2018
The aim of this simulation study, determine the relationship between true latent scores and estimated latent scores by including various control variables and different statistical models. The study also aimed to compare the statistical models and determine the effects of different distribution types, response formats and sample sizes on latent…
Descriptors: Simulation, Context Effect, Computation, Statistical Analysis
Stanley, Leanne M.; Edwards, Michael C. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
The purpose of this article is to highlight the distinction between the reliability of test scores and the fit of psychometric measurement models, reminding readers why it is important to consider both when evaluating whether test scores are valid for a proposed interpretation and/or use. It is often the case that an investigator judges both the…
Descriptors: Test Reliability, Goodness of Fit, Scores, Patients
Ranger, Jochen; Kuhn, Jorg-Tobias – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2013
It is common practice to log-transform response times before analyzing them with standard factor analytical methods. However, sometimes the log-transformation is not capable of linearizing the relation between the response times and the latent traits. Therefore, a more general approach to response time analysis is proposed in the current…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Simulation, Reaction Time, Least Squares Statistics
Finch, Holmes – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
Estimation of multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model parameters can be carried out using the normal ogive with unweighted least squares estimation with the normal-ogive harmonic analysis robust method (NOHARM) software. Previous simulation research has demonstrated that this approach does yield accurate and efficient estimates of item…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Computation, Test Items, Simulation
Yang-Wallentin, Fan; Joreskog, Karl G.; Luo, Hao – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Ordinal variables are common in many empirical investigations in the social and behavioral sciences. Researchers often apply the maximum likelihood method to fit structural equation models to ordinal data. This assumes that the observed measures have normal distributions, which is not the case when the variables are ordinal. A better approach is…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Computation
Rhemtulla, Mijke; Brosseau-Liard, Patricia E.; Savalei, Victoria – Psychological Methods, 2012
A simulation study compared the performance of robust normal theory maximum likelihood (ML) and robust categorical least squares (cat-LS) methodology for estimating confirmatory factor analysis models with ordinal variables. Data were generated from 2 models with 2-7 categories, 4 sample sizes, 2 latent distributions, and 5 patterns of category…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Computation, Simulation, Sample Size
Forero, Carlos G.; Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto – Psychological Methods, 2009
The performance of parameter estimates and standard errors in estimating F. Samejima's graded response model was examined across 324 conditions. Full information maximum likelihood (FIML) was compared with a 3-stage estimator for categorical item factor analysis (CIFA) when the unweighted least squares method was used in CIFA's third stage. CIFA…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Computation, Item Response Theory
Beauducel, Andre; Herzberg, Philipp Yorck – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2006
This simulation study compared maximum likelihood (ML) estimation with weighted least squares means and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimation. The study was based on confirmatory factor analyses with 1, 2, 4, and 8 factors, based on 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 cases, and on 5, 10, 20, and 40 variables with 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 categories. There was no…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Classification, Sample Size

Briggs, Nancy E.; MacCallum, Robert C. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2003
Examined the relative performance of two commonly used methods of parameter estimation in factor analysis, maximum likelihood (ML) and ordinary least squares (OLS) through simulation. In situations with a moderate amount of error, ML often failed to recover the weak factor while OLS succeeded. Also presented an example using empirical data. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Skakun, Ernest N.; Hakstian, A. Ralph – 1974
Two population raw data matrices were constructed by computer simulation techniques. Each consisted of 10,000 subjects and 12 variables, and each was constructed according to an underlying factorial model consisting of four major common factors, eight minor common factors, and 12 unique factors. The computer simulation techniques were employed to…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Matrices