Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Factor Structure | 17 |
Factor Analysis | 12 |
Intelligence Tests | 12 |
Test Validity | 9 |
Children | 8 |
Elementary Education | 7 |
Cognitive Processes | 6 |
Achievement Tests | 4 |
Construct Validity | 4 |
Cognitive Ability | 3 |
Models | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 17 |
Reports - Research | 15 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Kaufman Assessment Battery… | 17 |
Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McGill, Ryan J.; Dombrowski, Stefan C. – Contemporary School Psychology, 2018
The factor structure of the 16 core and supplementary Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) model subtests for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (KABC-II; Kaufman and Kaufman, 2004a) standardization sample samples aged 7-18 (N = 2025) was examined using exploratory factor analytic techniques (EFA) not included in the KABC-II manual…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Children, Intelligence Tests
McGill, Ryan J. – Psychology in the Schools, 2020
The present study examined the factor structure of the Kaufman assessment battery for children-second edition normative update with normative sample participants aged 7-18 years (N = 500) using confirmatory factor analysis with maximum likelihood estimation and multidimensional scaling procedures. For the 10 subtest Cattell-Horn-Carroll core…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Children, Test Validity, Factor Structure
McGill, Ryan J. – Psychology in the Schools, 2017
The present study examined the factor structure of the Luria interpretive model for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (KABC-II) with normative sample participants aged 7-18 (N = 2,025) using confirmatory factor analysis with maximum-likelihood estimation. For the eight subtest Luria configuration, an alternative…
Descriptors: Children, Intelligence Tests, Models, Factor Structure
Potvin, Deborah C. H.; Keith, Timothy Z.; Caemmerer, Jacqueline M.; Trundt, Katherine M. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2015
With an age range from 3 to 13 years, the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (KABC-II) offers an appealing option for the assessment of cognitive abilities for children. Although independent research has provided evidence of the construct validity of the KABC-II for school-age children, previous studies have rarely included an…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Factor Structure, Preschool Children, Cognitive Ability
Reynolds, Matthew R.; Keith, Timothy Z.; Beretvas, S. Natasha – Intelligence, 2010
Spearman's law of diminishing returns (SLODR) posits that at higher levels of general cognitive ability the general factor ("g") performs less well in explaining individual differences in cognitive test performance. Research has generally supported SLODR, but previous research has required the a priori division of respondents into…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Cognitive Tests, Cognitive Ability, Individual Differences
Reynolds, Matthew R.; Keith, Timothy Z. – Intelligence, 2007
Spearman's "law of diminishing returns" or SLODR refers to a decrease in "g" saturation as ability level increases. SLODR has been demonstrated in a number of intellectual batteries but several important aspects of the phenomenon are not yet well understood. We investigated the presence of SLODR in the Kaufman Assessment…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Factor Analysis, Ability Grouping, Factor Structure

Ochieng, Charles O. – International Journal of Testing, 2003
Conducted a meta-analysis of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) to ascertain the numbers of factors in the mental processing subtest of the K-ABC. Analyses yielded sequential and simultaneous processing factors, suggesting that the original K-ABC theory was not supported. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Intelligence Tests

Willson, Victor L.; And Others – Journal of School Psychology, 1985
Presents results of confirmatory factor analysis of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for children which is based on the underlying theoretical model of sequential, simultaneous, and achievement factors. Found support for the two-factor, simultaneous and sequential processing model. (MCF)
Descriptors: Achievement, Children, Cognitive Processes, Factor Analysis

McCallum, R. Steve; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1985
Gifted elementary students (N=54) completed the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Factor structures for mental processing and achievement subtests were compared to factor structures for children from the standardization sample, revealing similar structures. The most parsimonious structure, however, accounted for under 40 percent of shared…
Descriptors: Achievement, Children, Cognitive Processes, Factor Structure

Kaufman, Alan S.; McLean, James E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Investigated factor structures of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) for 212 normal children. Findings suggest correspondence between: (1) WISC-R Verbal Comprehension and K-ABC Achievement; (2) WISC-R Perceptual Organization and K-ABC Simultaneous Processing; and (3) WISC-R…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure

Swanson, H. Lee; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1989
The factor structure of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children was evaluated with 169 gifted students, aged 6-10. Results tentatively suggested that the factor solution for gifted students is dissimilar to that for the standardization sample, as subtests designed to assess sequential processing did not all load together, nor did those…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Elementary Education, Factor Structure, Gifted

Keith, Timothy Z. – Psychology in the Schools, 1986
K-ABC (Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children) scores for 585 school-age children referred for psychological evaluation were factor analyzed. While it appears that the K-ABC factor structure is quite consistent for both normal and exceptional children, the meaning and names of factors found are open to interpretation. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Exceptional Persons, Factor Structure

Kaufman, Alan S.; Kamphaus, Randy W. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
The construct validity of the Sequential Processing, Simultaneous Processing and Achievement scales of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children was supported by factor-analytic investigations of a representative national stratified sample of 2,000 children. Correlations provided insight into the relationship of sequential/simultaneous…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Factor Analysis

Valencia, Richard R.; Rankin, Richard J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1986
Factor analyses of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) were performed on separate groups of Anglo (n=100) and Mexican-American (n=100) fifth-grade children to determine the comparability of underlying structures and to examine the existence of possible bias in construct validity of the K-ABC for each group. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Factor Analysis

Kline, Rex B.; And Others – Assessment, 1994
The construct validity of a supplemental scoring system for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) was evaluated with 146 referred school-age children (aged 6 to 12.5 years) and the K-ABC normative sample. Results support the construct validity of only part of the scoring model. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Construct Validity, Correlation, Elementary Education
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2