Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Faculty Development | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Mathematics Instruction | 1 |
| Mathematics Teachers | 1 |
| Mathematics Tests | 1 |
| Professional Autonomy | 1 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1 |
| Reflection | 1 |
| Secondary School Teachers | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ZDM: Mathematics Education | 1 |
Author
| Karsenty, Ronnie | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Israel | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKarsenty, Ronnie – ZDM: Mathematics Education, 2021
In this paper I explore the question of what counts as successful implementation of a mathematics professional development (PD) project at scale. Two kinds of upscale are presented and differentiated from one another: upscale of settings and upscale of values, and the link between this differentiation and how success may be defined is discussed.…
Descriptors: Mathematics Teachers, Mathematics Instruction, Faculty Development, High Stakes Tests
