Descriptor
Source
| Improving College and… | 21 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 12 |
| Opinion Papers | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
Location
| Canada | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Diener, Thomas J. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Student evaluations, often ignored, are a valuable evaluative method for teachers. (PG)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Student Teacher Relationship
Dansereau, Raymond A. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Student Teacher Relationship
Bromley, Ann; And Others – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Reports on faculty evaluation conducted by a Student Government Association. (Editor)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Attitudes
Dwyer, Francis M. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Wooten, Bob E.; McCullough, Charles D. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1984
Combining period objectives and base evaluations creates an environment of continuing education in a well-functioning college. Specific and measurable attainment can be documented under the heading of "Period Objectives" including: preparation and publication of articles, performance of research projects, and presentation of scholarly papers. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Measurement Objectives
Leonard, Wilbert M. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Student Reaction
Jandt, Fred E. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Student Reaction
Gies, Frederick John; Leonard, B. Charles – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Administrator Role, Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation
Lawler, Peter Augustine – Improving College and University Teaching, 1982
In answer to why faculty and administrators rely on quantification of faculty performance (i.e., productivity measures), two reasons are given: (1) it is the only evaluation that is persuasive to a democratic audience (the public); and (2) it is better than none at all. (MSE)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, College Instruction, Democracy
Orpen, Christopher – Improving College and University Teaching, 1982
A study compared tenured and nontenured faculty, based on seniority, discipline area, and previous degree, for productivity in terms of publications. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses yielded similar results: that tenured faculty are no less productive than nontenured. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria
Pulich, Marcia Ann – Improving College and University Teaching, 1984
Suggestions for improving the design and use of student evaluation forms include tailoring the forms to the class needs and format, wording statements carefully, training students to evaluate performance, allowing ample time for completion, handling the evaluation procedure without involvement of the professor, and eliminating student anonymity.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Smoot, Joseph G. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1978
Andrews University's commitment to teacher improvement is evidenced by the availability of instructional materials and assistance in using them, and in its faculty development program that includes a new teacher seminar and a Committee on Instruction and Research. Faculty evaluation is the logical outcome of the program. (JMD)
Descriptors: College Libraries, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Lasher, Harry J. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1978
A model for implementing a Management by Objectives (MBO) system in the academic environment is presented and potential problems are explored. Some of the pitfalls discussed include: organizational climate, clarity of objectives, assumption that MBO concepts are readily understood, instant success syndrome, and economic reward myopia. (JMD)
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, College Administration, Educational Environment
Miller, Stanley – Improving College and University Teaching, 1984
Research on the validity of student rating scales of teacher performance is inconsistent, and the issue of why the scales are used needs examination. Until their criterion validity is raised to correlations of .7 to .8 or construct validity can be established, results should not be used in making tenure decisions. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Uguroglu, Margaret E.; Dwyer, Mary M. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1981
The faculty peer review system described assumes cooperation between employees and employers toward individual and departmental goals, and provides measures of change in objectives or behavior. Experiences at San Jose State are reported and a President's scholars review form is included. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Departments, Educational Objectives
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
